Timeline for Additional Badge Ideas
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2010 at 15:07 | comment | added | Andy E | @Grace Note: I see now, that's a very good point. I hadn't thought about that, but the same is true of non-wiki answer badges like enlightened or great answer - those could have been edited by another user too. The badge name comes from the idea of not receiving anything in return (in this case, rep) when giving something away (knowledge), although I can see you got that :-) | |
| Jul 13, 2010 at 14:45 | comment | added | Grace Note StaffMod | A seed answer would be the root from which a real answer grows. In other words, someone else might have posted the original answer, and as CW encourages other people to add their say, it evolves into a lovely answer that attracts many votes. Note that I don't think seed answers are bad - after all they yield good answers and are perfectly a good idea. But I think it kinda conflicts with what you might be intending for your badge (with a name like "Donator"). But I could be wrong, I could see a seed being a perfect setup of a donation, the first cent that starts a revolutionary benefit. | |
| Jul 13, 2010 at 14:37 | comment | added | Andy E | @Grace: what are "seed" answers? | |
| Jul 13, 2010 at 14:09 | comment | added | Grace Note StaffMod | This is tricky to award because technically, there's no guarantee that your upvotes will be for that user's content. You could easily award this badge for "seed" answers. | |
| Jul 13, 2010 at 13:59 | history | answered | Andy E | CC BY-SA 2.5 |