Timeline for Shouldn't you take the plunge and have a per-site Meta for Stack Overflow too in favor of meta.stackexchange.com?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2011 at 18:08 | comment | added | Jon Ericson | What's a SE 1.0 site? ;-) | |
| Sep 15, 2010 at 11:12 | vote | accept | Steffen Opel | ||
| Sep 15, 2010 at 11:12 | |||||
| Sep 15, 2010 at 11:11 | vote | accept | Steffen Opel | ||
| Sep 15, 2010 at 11:11 | |||||
| Sep 15, 2010 at 11:11 | vote | accept | Steffen Opel | ||
| Sep 15, 2010 at 11:11 | |||||
| Jul 23, 2010 at 13:30 | comment | added | jjnguy | @Tobias, I think it is a bit more complicated than that. | |
| Jul 23, 2010 at 11:19 | comment | added | Tobias Kienzler | Aren't all SE-1.0 sites that are successful enough to be not decommissioned intended to be upgraded to SE-2.0 anyway? | |
| Jul 23, 2010 at 10:04 | comment | added | Steffen Opel | Yes, I mentioned this already in my arguments - decommissioned forever is a pretty high bar to tackle, but treating SE 1.0 sites as fair as possible like so is much appreciated of course (+1)! So I realize this is a more difficult issue than I thought initially, hence thanks much for considering it at least, and for implementing the per-site Metas in the first place of course, an extremely welcome substantial improvement :) | |
| Jul 23, 2010 at 9:38 | history | answered | Jeff Atwood | CC BY-SA 2.5 |