Timeline for Upvoting the automatically created duplicate comment could count as half a close vote
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2010 at 10:54 | comment | added | RomanSt | There are too many unclosed duplicates; anything that encourages them being found is a +1 from me. (Shame it's too late) | |
| Aug 7, 2010 at 4:12 | comment | added | NullUserException อ_อ | This is a horrible idea; closing is as bad as it now with the 3k rep requirement. | |
| Aug 7, 2010 at 0:03 | history | edited | Jeff Atwood |
edited tags
|
|
| Aug 4, 2010 at 18:03 | vote | accept | Tobias Kienzler | ||
| Aug 4, 2010 at 18:03 | vote | accept | Tobias Kienzler | ||
| Aug 4, 2010 at 18:03 | |||||
| Aug 4, 2010 at 14:10 | answer | added | Grace NoteStaffMod | timeline score: 6 | |
| Aug 4, 2010 at 14:02 | answer | added | David Thornley | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 4, 2010 at 13:56 | comment | added | Tobias Kienzler | @Neil Butterworth: only to help identifying duplicates, not close-voting in general | |
| Aug 4, 2010 at 13:55 | comment | added | nb69307 | Why do we want low-rep users to be able to vote to close? | |
| Aug 4, 2010 at 13:53 | history | asked | Tobias Kienzler | CC BY-SA 2.5 |