Timeline for Legal page says user content is under cc-by-sa-3.0, but other pages say cc-by-sa-2.5
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2014 at 10:25 | comment | added | lofidevops | outstanding issue: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/214633 | |
| Apr 8, 2011 at 23:42 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | @matt we just re-licensed under 3.0 | |
| Apr 8, 2011 at 23:41 | history | edited | Jeff Atwood | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 57 characters in body
|
| Jan 14, 2011 at 4:23 | comment | added | mattdm | There's an important way in which they are relevant: content with newer versions of the license isn't backwards-compatible and so cannot be incorporated into stack exchange questions or answers. I know we want new, original content, but sometimes it's helpful to be able to incorporate other CC-licensed material. | |
| Aug 23, 2010 at 5:51 | vote | accept | Matthew Flaschen | ||
| Aug 23, 2010 at 3:20 | history | answered | Jeff Atwood | CC BY-SA 2.5 |