Timeline for Ways to encourage users to 'Accept' answers
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2020 at 13:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 24, 2014 at 13:12 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Aug 24, 2010 at 11:37 | comment | added | devinb | @cdburgess All of your questions are answered in the various links I provided. Specifically the answer regarding "Ignoring Users" | |
| Aug 23, 2010 at 23:09 | comment | added | Chuck Burgess | There are some flaws in the thinking here. If this site is about generating content and not about the users, then why does it need users? Well written but obscure questions could still benefit from the "no accepted answers and here's why" option. Ignoring users should be acceptable. If something is flagged as offensive by me doesn't necessarily make it offensive to others. It's not about offense. If I feel someone is abusing my generosity to help them, maybe I don't want to help them any more. Hiding them from my feed would be completely acceptable. Why not? | |
| Aug 23, 2010 at 23:06 | comment | added | Georg Fritzsche | Good points regarding ignoring - SO is centered on questions and answers, not single users. | |
| Aug 23, 2010 at 23:00 | history | answered | devinb | CC BY-SA 2.5 |