Timeline for Answer deletion by Community♦ is a 100 penalty? Why no reason for deletion is provided?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2020 at 13:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Oct 8, 2010 at 5:41 | vote | accept | OTZ | ||
| Sep 29, 2010 at 6:45 | comment | added | OTZ | @Marc I recommend that SO implement a feature to put up the exact reason for deletion. If it is noticeable, which you say is by design, then it is natural for the answerer to seek the reason for it. RIGHT? | |
| Sep 29, 2010 at 6:07 | comment | added | Marc Gravell | @OTZ - 9 people thought otherwise. Actually, speaking as a dev I also don't think any of those points would help me understand the structure in any sensible way. But perhaps the bigger point here is - be courteous in your answer, or it will be perceived negatively. You don't have to agree with people, but be civil, or the community will flag it. | |
| Sep 29, 2010 at 6:04 | history | edited | Marc Gravell | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 379 characters in body; added 9 characters in body
|
| Sep 29, 2010 at 6:02 | comment | added | OTZ |
have you tried tree -CFft yourself? it's such a nice little command to see the structure of the source tree. also, you are not quoting my entire post. im also suggesting the questioner to use grep to find function applications and sort by the number of applied functions and to read README first. it does contain helpful information.
|
|
| Sep 29, 2010 at 5:57 | history | answered | Marc Gravell | CC BY-SA 2.5 |