Timeline for Public Service Announcement: ongoing, offsite discussion about Area 51 graduates' branding
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2010 at 20:58 | comment | added | Tim Stone | @rchern: I had a response to that, but in light of the fact that I think I might have imagined reading comments/I'm not confident at all about my perception on how the ranking process works, I'm just going to strike my original comment. :P | |
| Oct 4, 2010 at 20:32 | comment | added | Rebecca Chernoff | @Tim, the former. When it was initially presented before being posted to MNTI, google rank was the main issue and naming was the secondary issue. | |
| Oct 4, 2010 at 20:01 | history | edited | Pekka | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 4 characters in body; added 98 characters in body; added 12 characters in body
|
| Oct 4, 2010 at 19:59 | comment | added | Tim Stone | @rchern: Just so I'm clear, are you referring to the bit about ranking in the Meta NTI/WA question, or something else? | |
| Oct 4, 2010 at 19:49 | history | edited | Pekka | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 22 characters in body; deleted 58 characters in body
|
| Oct 4, 2010 at 19:49 | comment | added | Rebecca Chernoff | @Tim, losing google ranking is what started the mess. It wasn't about naming. It was about google search results. There was a 301 in place for the 24 hours NTI was actually NTI. | |
| Oct 4, 2010 at 19:47 | comment | added | Tim Stone | Losing Google ranking. I think that Jeff mentioned somewhere that this was a non-issue since there will be a 301 redirect in place, but other than that I agree. | |
| Oct 4, 2010 at 19:45 | comment | added | Pekka | @rchern yup. This is bound to lead to future clashes, when a community has reached Server Fault levels, but won't get a domain name for these reasons. This is a dangerous promise to make | |
| Oct 4, 2010 at 19:43 | comment | added | Rebecca Chernoff | @Pekka, I didn't mean it like that. It is something I've said elsewhere, but I absolutely agree. I don't buy the team (or the community for that matter) being willing to switch the name of an established site like this. | |
| Oct 4, 2010 at 19:37 | history | edited | Pekka | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 60 characters in body
|
| Oct 4, 2010 at 19:33 | comment | added | Pekka | @rchern I'm sorry if I repeated something you have already said from the start. In my defense I have to say that the discussion has expanded so much (and across two sites) it has become really difficult to keep track of :) | |
| Oct 4, 2010 at 19:32 | comment | added | Rebecca Chernoff | I've been saying this since this whole mess started! | |
| Oct 4, 2010 at 19:23 | history | answered | Pekka | CC BY-SA 2.5 |