Timeline for Golfscript in Codegolf on SO — cheating or not? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Sep 10, 2012 at 22:09 | history | closed |
user149432 yhw42 jonsca John Saunders Pops |
too localized | |
| Sep 7, 2012 at 1:52 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 10, 2012 at 22:09 | |||||
| Oct 8, 2010 at 22:02 | comment | added | NullUserException อ_อ | @sepp Touché. What makes this even more pointless is that one could easily write a GolfScript interpreter in C. How is the language in which another language is implemented relevant? This is a total non-argument. | |
| Oct 8, 2010 at 21:05 | comment | added | sepp2k | Why the hate against ruby? Something can't be a language because it's implemented in ruby? Come on. Not only are the properties of a language completely independent of how and using what language the language is implemented, but the implication that implementing a language in ruby makes it somehow inferior or less of a language than a language implemented in C, is just plain insulting to ruby programmers. | |
| Oct 8, 2010 at 20:24 | answer | added | NullUserException อ_อ | timeline score: 15 | |
| Oct 8, 2010 at 19:06 | comment | added | Aarobot | Why do you assume that people haven't read your question? I'm quite certain that they all read it and all have the same message: It's a tempest in a teapot, and you should get over it. | |
| Oct 8, 2010 at 18:55 | comment | added | Nakilon | @Aarobot, I don'twant to discuss a library. Why Meta's people read questions so uncarefully... Question is to count a Golfscript a library or language? But all answers here are of form "I don't want to talk about your question", so why are you answering? Weird... | |
| Oct 8, 2010 at 17:45 | comment | added | Aarobot | You think it's important to discuss the use of a specific code library, in code golf competitions, on a Q&A site that barely tolerates them as an amusing diversion? You have way too much time on your hands. | |
| Oct 8, 2010 at 17:24 | answer | added | Michael F | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 8, 2010 at 4:23 | answer | added | Michael Mrozek | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 8, 2010 at 4:05 | answer | added | thyrgle | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 8, 2010 at 1:13 | answer | added | dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 8, 2010 at 0:47 | history | edited | Nakilon | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 61 characters in body
|
| Oct 8, 2010 at 0:28 | history | edited | Nakilon | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
edited title; added 3 characters in body
|
| Oct 8, 2010 at 0:12 | history | asked | Nakilon | CC BY-SA 2.5 |