Timeline for Should there be a "generalist" badge on Stack Exchange itself?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2011 at 1:22 | comment | added | AviD | so make it "... on non-Beta sites." Anyway, silly to get a badge for a site that may not be around next week... | |
| Dec 31, 2010 at 18:19 | comment | added | Pekka | @Steve funny, I like the two others better because they "scale": It's harder to achieve the badges through some accidentally massively upvoted contributions on some young site whose audience has no clear rules yet on what is good content. The page order and reputation leagues don't fluctuate that heavily, I think it would be an acceptable measure. | |
| Dec 31, 2010 at 17:08 | comment | added | Steve V. | +1 for the Generalist tag. The others seem far too arbitrary as they currently stand - it seems that it would just be down to luck whether you managed to get on page 1 with all five sites at the same time, or whatever. | |
| Dec 31, 2010 at 16:12 | history | edited | Pekka | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 182 characters in body; added 28 characters in body; added 31 characters in body; added 93 characters in body; deleted 58 characters in body; deleted 148 characters in body
|
| Dec 31, 2010 at 15:40 | history | edited | Pekka | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 1 characters in body; added 5 characters in body
|
| Dec 31, 2010 at 15:35 | history | answered | Pekka | CC BY-SA 2.5 |