Timeline for Latest activity at Area 51 could be wrongly calculated
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2011 at 18:30 | comment | added | Maniero | @Robert: I agree that the problem is not wide-spread, I just said that it exists. | |
| Jan 7, 2011 at 18:16 | history | edited | David Fullerton | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 2 characters in body; added 2 characters in body
|
| Jan 7, 2011 at 17:33 | comment | added | Robert Cartaino | @bigown: (1) I see no evidence of wide-spread commenting to (uselessly) to keep a proposal around. I delete thousands of them so non-organic efforts to preserve the random, ill-conceived proposal is likely to be futile, but harmless. (2) I agree with @David; the calculations have two completely separate purposes. I'm more likely to simply change the wording in the FAQ so "latest activity" does not get confused with determining if a proposal has been completely abandoned. | |
| Jan 7, 2011 at 17:20 | comment | added | Maniero | Although I think this is a misleading information I can understand. Unfortunately users are gaming the system just posting a comment to keep the proposal live. | |
| Jan 7, 2011 at 15:59 | history | answered | David Fullerton | CC BY-SA 2.5 |