Timeline for Backslash escaping in code regions in comments
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:37 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.tex.stackexchange.com/ with https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:45 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:28 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Jan 8, 2011 at 15:04 | comment | added | Tomalak | Instead of arguing how escaping backticks works, I'd rather have the in-line code sections in comments behave the exact same way as their cousins in the question. If escaping backticks works there, all is fine anyway; if it doesn't, then there's no point in making it work in comments. | |
| Jan 8, 2011 at 13:57 | comment | added | moinudin | <code>test ` </code>. Okay, you're right didn't realise it didn't work in comments. :-/ | |
| Jan 8, 2011 at 13:54 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | @marcog: They are indeed rarer in the languages I usually use, but other people may need them more. And in any case they must be possible to type. <code> is ok for answers, but this discussion is about comments. | |
| Jan 8, 2011 at 13:39 | comment | added | moinudin |
I think backticks are rarer than backslashes in code. You can always get the former using <code>`</code>.
|
|
| Jan 8, 2011 at 13:18 | history | answered | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | CC BY-SA 2.5 |