Timeline for Is everyone in favor of the new "everyone can edit" idea? Is this really such a good idea?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
30 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2020 at 3:51 | comment | added | The Unhandled Exception | Pretty amusing @AryanBeezadhur -- since I asked this question 9 years ago I have now realized that allowing anonymous users to edit is a great feature and think the network is better with it! | |
| Jan 4, 2020 at 21:39 | comment | added | cobrexus | Funnily enough, the question against the ‘anyone can edit’ idea was itself edited by the community (a user not logged in) | |
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:45 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:28 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Feb 29, 2012 at 14:14 | vote | accept | The Unhandled Exception | ||
| Feb 4, 2011 at 2:23 | answer | added | Ken Bloom | timeline score: -1 | |
| Jan 25, 2011 at 6:55 | history | edited | Jeff Atwood |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 25, 2011 at 6:36 | history | rollback | Benjol |
Rollback to Revision 2
|
|
| Jan 25, 2011 at 6:36 | history | edited | Benjol |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 20, 2011 at 2:30 | answer | added | Kev | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 20, 2011 at 1:45 | comment | added | robert_x44 | To be honest, I was thinking some people were making unnecessary edits as it was :)P I've seen a fair number of edits that went too far beyond a simple 'fix up the poor grammar, spelling and formatting' scope for my taste. But I can certainly see why it would be helpful to allow more willing participants to edit. The Next Big Thing won't automatically kill us. Unless it does. Get off my lawn. | |
| Jan 20, 2011 at 1:41 | comment | added | Lance Roberts | I'd love to get some rep for editing. | |
| Jan 20, 2011 at 1:30 | answer | added | Justin | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 20, 2011 at 0:37 | answer | added | The Unhandled Exception | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jan 20, 2011 at 0:26 | answer | added | waffles | timeline score: 47 | |
| Jan 19, 2011 at 23:44 | comment | added | The Unhandled Exception | Ouch, @Shog9, ouch! ;-) | |
| Jan 19, 2011 at 23:41 | comment | added | Shog9 | @every: see, this is why we so desperately need this feature. I'm way too lazy to edit this post, but I'd approve your hatchet-job in a heartbeat! | |
| Jan 19, 2011 at 23:33 | history | edited | The Unhandled Exception | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 118 characters in body
|
| Jan 19, 2011 at 23:32 | comment | added | The Unhandled Exception | @Arjan, yes, that was it, thanks! | |
| Jan 19, 2011 at 23:30 | answer | added | Shog9 | timeline score: 38 | |
| Jan 19, 2011 at 23:23 | comment | added | Arjan | Originating feature request (I assume): Allow low-rep users to suggest edits. | |
| Jan 19, 2011 at 23:19 | comment | added | Alex Gordon | @josh i agree with you its a really bad idea because if i had that privilege i would delete half of what you wrote | |
| Jan 19, 2011 at 23:19 | answer | added | badp | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jan 19, 2011 at 23:19 | answer | added | random | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 19, 2011 at 23:13 | answer | added | Mad Scientist | timeline score: 9 | |
| Jan 19, 2011 at 23:11 | comment | added | Jon Seigel | 10k's can see my deleted answer here: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/49716/… -- I disagreed with the proposed mechanics. (I deleted the post because the question was simplified to just a concept.) | |
| Jan 19, 2011 at 23:10 | comment | added | ChrisF Mod | I'll admit I was very surprised when I saw waffles' question the other day. I remain to be convinced opening up editing is a good idea. | |
| Jan 19, 2011 at 23:02 | comment | added | The Unhandled Exception | I've said my piece. Feel free to downvote me to oblivion if you disagree! | |
| Jan 19, 2011 at 23:02 | history | asked | The Unhandled Exception | CC BY-SA 2.5 |