Skip to main content
replaced http://meta.stackoverflow.com/ with https://meta.stackoverflow.com/
Source Link

I've not seen the post which was the subject of your question, but just to add some perspective. The term 'rep-whorerep-whore' is pretty common here, and isn't generally considered to be offensive, though it might be construed as mildly insulting - though not necessarily, because people do self-describe as rep-whores too.

I'd imagine that the person who edited that part out wasn't aware of this...

I've not seen the post which was the subject of your question, but just to add some perspective. The term 'rep-whore' is pretty common here, and isn't generally considered to be offensive, though it might be construed as mildly insulting - though not necessarily, because people do self-describe as rep-whores too.

I'd imagine that the person who edited that part out wasn't aware of this...

I've not seen the post which was the subject of your question, but just to add some perspective. The term 'rep-whore' is pretty common here, and isn't generally considered to be offensive, though it might be construed as mildly insulting - though not necessarily, because people do self-describe as rep-whores too.

I'd imagine that the person who edited that part out wasn't aware of this...

Source Link
Benjol
  • 17.9k
  • 2
  • 52
  • 90

I've not seen the post which was the subject of your question, but just to add some perspective. The term 'rep-whore' is pretty common here, and isn't generally considered to be offensive, though it might be construed as mildly insulting - though not necessarily, because people do self-describe as rep-whores too.

I'd imagine that the person who edited that part out wasn't aware of this...