Timeline for Why edit out inflammatory language? Is that censorship?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2011 at 22:07 | history | edited | This_is_NOT_a_forum | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 53 characters in body
|
| Feb 4, 2011 at 14:44 | comment | added | Trufa | @chibacity no prob! I think we both agree in the basic concepts. Which is something like, best users should be penalized for being the best! That is what matters. To sum it up, I think our disagreement lies on whether that question is useful or not, and we simply disagree (which is a good thing) with this answer I just intended to give my point of view, I <strike>repsect</strike> understand yours perfectly! | |
| Feb 4, 2011 at 14:30 | comment | added | chibacity | You make some very good points - cheers for the effort. I am not suggesting that spelling mistakes and factual errors are left in, far from it (I say this explicitly in the question). I do think it was a personal localized rant, and censoring it only served to legitimize it in my view and make it seem kocher. You can down-vote if you feel the question is not "useful" e.g. a personal rant. | |
| Feb 4, 2011 at 14:19 | history | answered | Trufa | CC BY-SA 2.5 |