Timeline for Are users who have a suggested edit rejected valid targets for @comment replies?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2011 at 10:08 | comment | added | Arjan | As explained in Pending approvals: allow for adding reasons to rejections, sometimes one might need some investigation to find that an edit is spam or otherwise wrong, and one might like to pass that thoughts to the second reviewer? The same might apply to approvals, @bdonlan. Surely all very optional. (I know, spam should ALSO be reported by flagging some other post, and explaining the thing.) | |
| Feb 12, 2011 at 16:52 | comment | added | Arjan | Related feature request: Possibility to add a comment to a rejected suggested edit. | |
| Feb 7, 2011 at 12:52 | comment | added | bdonlan | Do we really need accept comments? And there should be a topbar notification for rejects; people should know they've been rejected and learn from it. That's the point of the suggested edits feature after all - to let low-rep users learn what the community considers an acceptable edit. | |
| Feb 7, 2011 at 12:34 | comment | added | Arjan | Maybe not full commenting (with replies etc.), but only (optional?) accept/reject comments, just like revision comments? (This would only be useful if there will be some overview that links to the permalinks though, like in a user profile? Otherwise most people won't know where to find the edits they proposed to start with.) | |
| Feb 7, 2011 at 10:06 | history | answered | waffles | CC BY-SA 2.5 |