Timeline for Cleaning up terribly formulated questions - Encouraged or not?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Feb 18, 2011 at 14:06 | comment | added | Kriem | @Kop - Ok. Noted. :) I'll update my book. | |
| Feb 18, 2011 at 14:00 | comment | added | Andreas Bonini | maybe not by your book, but the community here on meta established that accepting an answer is completely optional. We also established that pestering the users with comments about the accept rate isn't nice and shouldn't be done; if a user has too low of an acceptance rate, the most you should do is simply not answer his or her question. | |
| Feb 18, 2011 at 13:44 | vote | accept | Kriem | ||
| Feb 18, 2011 at 13:05 | comment | added | The Unhandled Exception | Related: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/50479/… | |
| Feb 18, 2011 at 12:15 | comment | added | Kriem | @Kop - Most of the time, the question has been answered perfectly. Unwilling to accept an answer, in that case, is not playing by the rules in my (and others') book. Hence the regularly seen comment: 'work on your accept rate'. | |
| Feb 18, 2011 at 11:43 | comment | added | Andreas Bonini | Note that there is no "rule" saying that you must accept an answer, in fact it's completely optional | |
| Feb 18, 2011 at 11:35 | history | edited | Kriem | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Elaborated a bit
|
| Feb 18, 2011 at 11:09 | answer | added | Pekka | timeline score: 5 | |
| Feb 18, 2011 at 11:06 | answer | added | Tobias Kienzler | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 18, 2011 at 11:03 | answer | added | Ólafur Waage | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 18, 2011 at 11:01 | history | asked | Kriem | CC BY-SA 2.5 |