Timeline for Timing in the Edit-Suggestion/Improve cycle
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2011 at 14:40 | comment | added | Charles Stewart | @Grace: Ah! I thought that other editors counted towards the 10 edit limit. Thanks for the correction - I should probably change this answer now. | |
| Feb 28, 2011 at 14:33 | comment | added | Andrew Stacey | In the "reject - re-edit" version of the cycle then the submitted edit isn't visible and there's nothing attributed to the original editor (the reviewer's name goes on the edit). But I agree that it's not an ideal situation to have this. I don't think that we have yet reached the 10 edits on tex.SX, but it feels as though this feature potentially brings it a whole lot nearer. | |
| Feb 28, 2011 at 14:03 | comment | added | Grace Note StaffMod | 10 edits is only the limit for author edits. When it comes to other users editing a post, it only takes 5 separate users to convert a post to Community Wiki. With the improve function attributing to two separate users, that does actually significantly push the post towards the CW barrier. | |
| Feb 28, 2011 at 11:12 | history | answered | Charles Stewart | CC BY-SA 2.5 |