Timeline for Do we need a 'reject and improve' button?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2011 at 5:14 | comment | added | Lance Roberts | I'm getting so tired of seeing all the poor, crappy edits, but don't really want to reject and leave the post undedited. It's and OCD's worst nightmare. | |
| Mar 18, 2011 at 15:23 | comment | added | ire_and_curses | Regarding weak accepts - Jeff has indicated in a comment that he may add guidelines to the page to encourage better decisions. | |
| Mar 18, 2011 at 13:38 | comment | added | random Mod | Plus someone else is likely to hit that Approve button @mar | |
| Mar 18, 2011 at 13:37 | comment | added | Mark Peters | I don't think people aren't rejecting because they're soft, I think they're not rejecting because improving actually rejects the edit faster. I can cast a reject vote and watch the question be wrong for the next 10 minutes, or I can improve it now and make it right. That's not being soft. It's a pretty unfounded observation to make anyway, given the efficiency with which we close bad newbie questions. | |
| Mar 18, 2011 at 12:56 | history | answered | randomMod | CC BY-SA 2.5 |