Skip to main content
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
Source Link

I disagree strongly with limiting the ability to paste Google links into comments in any way. There is a category of brain-dead, exceedingly trivial questions, that can be answered by a link to the proper, authoritative page in the respective manual ("How do I replace a string in PHP?"). In those cases - and only those! - informing the OP of the existence of search engines is perfectly okay in my eyes.

Sometimes, it is right to comment "Just Google it" and a (polite) RTFM in the form of a manual link. Not always, mind, and it's always good to err on the lenient side. But sometimes, it really is.

Answers consisting of just a Google link or a mere RTFM are not okay, for the reasons you state. But as @dmckee points out, those are usually downvoted into the ground anyway.

Current exampleCurrent example where the user should have searched SO

I disagree strongly with limiting the ability to paste Google links into comments in any way. There is a category of brain-dead, exceedingly trivial questions, that can be answered by a link to the proper, authoritative page in the respective manual ("How do I replace a string in PHP?"). In those cases - and only those! - informing the OP of the existence of search engines is perfectly okay in my eyes.

Sometimes, it is right to comment "Just Google it" and a (polite) RTFM in the form of a manual link. Not always, mind, and it's always good to err on the lenient side. But sometimes, it really is.

Answers consisting of just a Google link or a mere RTFM are not okay, for the reasons you state. But as @dmckee points out, those are usually downvoted into the ground anyway.

Current example where the user should have searched SO

I disagree strongly with limiting the ability to paste Google links into comments in any way. There is a category of brain-dead, exceedingly trivial questions, that can be answered by a link to the proper, authoritative page in the respective manual ("How do I replace a string in PHP?"). In those cases - and only those! - informing the OP of the existence of search engines is perfectly okay in my eyes.

Sometimes, it is right to comment "Just Google it" and a (polite) RTFM in the form of a manual link. Not always, mind, and it's always good to err on the lenient side. But sometimes, it really is.

Answers consisting of just a Google link or a mere RTFM are not okay, for the reasons you state. But as @dmckee points out, those are usually downvoted into the ground anyway.

Current example where the user should have searched SO

added 38 characters in body
Source Link
Pekka
  • 114.5k
  • 70
  • 389
  • 640

I disagree strongly with limiting the ability to paste Google links into comments in any way. There is a category of brain-dead, exceedingly trivial questions, that can be answered by a link to the proper, authoritative page in the respective manual ("How do I replace a string in PHP?"). In those cases - and only those! - informing the OP of the existence of search engines is perfectly okay in my eyes.

Sometimes, it is right to comment "Just Google it" and "RTFM"a (polite) RTFM in the form of a manual link. Not always, mind, and it's always good to err on the lenient side. But sometimes, it really is.

Answers consisting of just a Google link or a mere RTFM are not okay, for the reasons you state. But as @dmckee points out, those are usually downvoted into the ground anyway.

Current example where the user should have searched SO

I disagree strongly with limiting the ability to paste Google links into comments in any way. There is a category of brain-dead, exceedingly trivial questions, that can be answered by a link to the proper, authoritative page in the respective manual ("How do I replace a string in PHP?"). In those cases - and only those! - informing the OP of the existence of search engines is perfectly okay in my eyes.

Sometimes, it is right to comment "Just Google it" and "RTFM". Not always, mind, and it's always good to err on the lenient side. But sometimes, it really is.

Answers consisting of just a Google link or a mere RTFM are not okay, for the reasons you state. But as @dmckee points out, those are usually downvoted into the ground anyway.

Current example where the user should have searched SO

I disagree strongly with limiting the ability to paste Google links into comments in any way. There is a category of brain-dead, exceedingly trivial questions, that can be answered by a link to the proper, authoritative page in the respective manual ("How do I replace a string in PHP?"). In those cases - and only those! - informing the OP of the existence of search engines is perfectly okay in my eyes.

Sometimes, it is right to comment "Just Google it" and a (polite) RTFM in the form of a manual link. Not always, mind, and it's always good to err on the lenient side. But sometimes, it really is.

Answers consisting of just a Google link or a mere RTFM are not okay, for the reasons you state. But as @dmckee points out, those are usually downvoted into the ground anyway.

Current example where the user should have searched SO

added 38 characters in body
Source Link
Pekka
  • 114.5k
  • 70
  • 389
  • 640

I disagree strongly with limiting the ability to paste Google links into comments in any way. There is a category of brain-dead, exceedingly trivial questions, that can be answered by a link to the proper, authoritative page in the respective manual ("How do I replace a string in PHP?"). In those cases - and only those! - informing the OP of the existence of search engines is perfectly okay in my eyes.

Sometimes, it is right to comment "Just Google it" and "RTFM". Not always, mind, and it's always good to err on the lenient side. But sometimes, it really is.

Answers consisting of just a Google link or a mere RTFM are not okay, for the reasons you state. But as @dmckee points out, those are usually downvoted into the ground anyway.

Current example where the user should have searched SO

I disagree strongly with limiting the ability to paste Google links into comments in any way. There is a category of brain-dead, exceedingly trivial questions, that can be answered by a link to the proper, authoritative page in the respective manual ("How do I replace a string in PHP?"). In those cases - and only those! - informing the OP of the existence of search engines is perfectly okay in my eyes.

Sometimes, it is right to comment "Just Google it" and "RTFM". Not always, mind, and it's always good to err on the lenient side. But sometimes, it really is.

Answers consisting of just a Google link or a mere RTFM are not okay, for the reasons you state. But as @dmckee points out, those are usually downvoted into the ground anyway.

Current example

I disagree strongly with limiting the ability to paste Google links into comments in any way. There is a category of brain-dead, exceedingly trivial questions, that can be answered by a link to the proper, authoritative page in the respective manual ("How do I replace a string in PHP?"). In those cases - and only those! - informing the OP of the existence of search engines is perfectly okay in my eyes.

Sometimes, it is right to comment "Just Google it" and "RTFM". Not always, mind, and it's always good to err on the lenient side. But sometimes, it really is.

Answers consisting of just a Google link or a mere RTFM are not okay, for the reasons you state. But as @dmckee points out, those are usually downvoted into the ground anyway.

Current example where the user should have searched SO

added 115 characters in body
Source Link
Pekka
  • 114.5k
  • 70
  • 389
  • 640
Loading
edited body; added 15 characters in body
Source Link
Pekka
  • 114.5k
  • 70
  • 389
  • 640
Loading
added 87 characters in body
Source Link
Pekka
  • 114.5k
  • 70
  • 389
  • 640
Loading
added 16 characters in body; deleted 23 characters in body; added 162 characters in body; added 6 characters in body
Source Link
Pekka
  • 114.5k
  • 70
  • 389
  • 640
Loading
Source Link
Pekka
  • 114.5k
  • 70
  • 389
  • 640
Loading