Timeline for Search [tag1] OR [tag2]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 12, 2022 at 20:33 | comment | added | Peter Thoeny |
This answer does not support what the OP and I are looking for. I have not found a way to search for tags regex and (javascript or perl ), e.g. [regex] and ([javascript] or [perl]) , or alternatively ([regex] [javascript]) or ([regex] [perl])
|
|
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Oct 20, 2016 at 19:39 | history | edited | Shadow Wizard | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
This is not weird anymore
|
S Oct 20, 2016 at 16:30 | history | edited | Rand al'Thor | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
Oct 20, 2016 at 14:52 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Oct 20, 2016 at 16:30 | |||||
Feb 26, 2014 at 8:43 | comment | added | Ilmari Karonen | This answer seems to be outdated: meta.stackoverflow.com/search?q=%5Btags%5D+or+%5Bsearch%5D works fine now. | |
Jan 3, 2012 at 21:30 | comment | added | Kevin Vermeer |
@JeffAtwood - Tim is correct. Searching for [tag1] or [tag2] results in a listing of all posts tagged with both [tag1] and [tag2] containing the word or , leading to [this /search page](meta.stackoverflow.com/search? q=%5Buncrustify%5D+or+%5Bundef%5D). Searching for [tag1] [or] [tag2] leads to the /tagged page you linked I've edited the answer back to the solution that Waiwai, Nick, Tim Stone, and I have found.
|
|
Jan 3, 2012 at 21:27 | history | edited | Kevin Vermeer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Corrected search term using [or] pseudo-tag.
|
Jan 3, 2012 at 20:27 | comment | added | Tim Stone |
@JeffAtwood You don't get the page you linked from searching for [uncrustify] or [undef] , which Nick says is intentional. Searching using [uncrustify] [or] [undef] does get you to that page, but apparently not intentionally.
|
|
Jan 3, 2012 at 20:14 | history | edited | Jeff Atwood | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 102 characters in body
|
Jan 3, 2012 at 20:14 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood |
uh, why are you doing [or] when just plain "or" works fine? stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/uncrustify%20or%20undef
|
|
Sep 15, 2011 at 16:04 | comment | added | ks1322 | Great, this is what I was looking for! | |
Apr 18, 2011 at 5:48 | history | answered | waiwai933 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |