Timeline for Should stack overflow sites share base rep(100) to some degree?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 9:43 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackoverflow.com/ with https://meta.stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| May 5, 2011 at 20:16 | comment | added | dpollitt | I disassociated all and readded, fixed! I have 113 rep here now. Not sure if it was a bug, or what exactly happened, but that did the trick. | |
| May 5, 2011 at 19:00 | vote | accept | dpollitt | ||
| May 5, 2011 at 18:57 | comment | added | mmyers Mod | @dpollitt: Your associations tab doesn't show anything for me. Can you dissassociate all your accounts and re-asssociate them? | |
| May 5, 2011 at 18:53 | comment | added | dpollitt | I have 428rep in the Photography site, so why do I only have 6 here? Shouldn't I have 101+? | |
| May 5, 2011 at 18:49 | comment | added | mmyers Mod | @dpollitt: Yes, sorry, was hunting up a suitable reference. | |
| May 5, 2011 at 18:48 | comment | added | dpollitt | Are you saying that this already is in place? | |
| May 5, 2011 at 18:46 | history | answered | mmyersMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |