Skip to main content
deleted 5 characters in body
Source Link
Pekka
  • 114.5k
  • 70
  • 389
  • 640

If the loss of a reputation point really is one of the main motivators behind the lack of downvoting, then I guess making it free or even cheaper is indeed the way to go.

How about not making it entirely free though, to keep a tiny safeguard in place? Like, making every 5 or 10 downvotes cost one point?

The normal rep count would continue to be displayed as an integer; for those who really need to know, the exact number could be displayed privately on the profile page, much like flag weight.

Just to offer another option. I'm not sure - completely free downvoting may indeed be the answer. It would see more abuse as a tool in personal conflicts, but that happens already and the net benefit is likely to vastly overshadow that.

If the loss of a reputation point really is one of the main motivators behind the lack of downvoting, then I guess making it free or even cheaper is indeed the way to go.

How about not making it entirely free though, to keep a tiny safeguard in place? Like, making every 5 or 10 downvotes cost one point?

The normal rep count would continue to be displayed as an integer; for those who really need to know, the exact number could be displayed privately on the profile page, much like flag weight.

Just to offer another option. I'm not sure - completely free downvoting may indeed be the answer. It would see more abuse as a tool in personal conflicts, but that happens already and the net benefit is likely to vastly overshadow that.

If the loss of a reputation point really is one of the main motivators behind the lack of downvoting, then I guess making it free or cheaper is indeed the way to go.

How about not making it entirely free though, to keep a tiny safeguard in place? Like, making every 5 or 10 downvotes cost one point?

The normal rep count would continue to be displayed as an integer; for those who really need to know, the exact number could be displayed privately on the profile page, much like flag weight.

Just to offer another option. I'm not sure - completely free downvoting may indeed be the answer. It would see more abuse as a tool in personal conflicts, but that happens already and the net benefit is likely to vastly overshadow that.

deleted 3 characters in body
Source Link
Pekka
  • 114.5k
  • 70
  • 389
  • 640

If the loss of a reputation point really is one of the main motivators behind the lack of downvoting, then I guess making it free or even cheaper is indeed the way to go.

How about not making it entirely free though, to keep a tiny safeguard in place? Like, making every 5 or 10 downvotes cost one point?

The normal rep count would continue to be displayed as an integer; for those who really need to know, the exact number could be displayed privately on the profile page, much like flag weight.

Just to offer another option. I'm not sure - completely free downvoting may indeed be the way to goanswer. It would see more abuse as a tool in personal conflicts, but that happens already and the net benefit is likely to vastly overshadow that.

If the loss of a reputation point really is one of the main motivators behind the lack of downvoting, then I guess making it free or even cheaper is indeed the way to go.

How about not making it entirely free though, to keep a tiny safeguard in place? Like, making every 5 or 10 downvotes cost one point?

The normal rep count would continue to be displayed as an integer; for those who really need to know, the exact number could be displayed privately on the profile page, much like flag weight.

Just to offer another option. I'm not sure - completely free downvoting may indeed be the way to go. It would see more abuse as a tool in personal conflicts, but that happens already and the net benefit is likely to vastly overshadow that.

If the loss of a reputation point really is one of the main motivators behind the lack of downvoting, then I guess making it free or even cheaper is indeed the way to go.

How about not making it entirely free though, to keep a tiny safeguard in place? Like, making every 5 or 10 downvotes cost one point?

The normal rep count would continue to be displayed as an integer; for those who really need to know, the exact number could be displayed privately on the profile page, much like flag weight.

Just to offer another option. I'm not sure - completely free downvoting may indeed be the answer. It would see more abuse as a tool in personal conflicts, but that happens already and the net benefit is likely to vastly overshadow that.

added 5 characters in body; added 1 characters in body
Source Link
Pekka
  • 114.5k
  • 70
  • 389
  • 640

If the loss of a reputation point really is one of the main motivators behind the lack of downvoting, then I guess making it free or even cheaper is indeed the way to go.

How about not making it entirely free though, to keep a tiny safeguard in place? Like, making every 5 or 10 downvotes cost one point?

The normal rep count would continue to be displayed as an integer; for those who really need to know, the exact number could be displayed privately on the profile page, much like flag weight.

Just to offer another option. I'm not sure - completely free downvoting may indeed be the way to go. It willwould see more abuse as a tool in personal conflicts, but that happens already and the net benefit is likely to vastly overshadow that.

If the loss of a reputation point really is one of the main motivators behind the lack of downvoting, then I guess making it free or cheaper is indeed the way to go.

How about not making it entirely free though, to keep a tiny safeguard in place? Like, making every 5 or 10 downvotes cost one point?

The normal rep count would continue to be displayed as an integer; for those who really need to know, the exact number could be displayed privately on the profile page, much like flag weight.

Just to offer another option. I'm not sure - completely free downvoting may indeed be the way to go. It will see more abuse as a tool in personal conflicts, but that happens already and the net benefit is likely to vastly overshadow that.

If the loss of a reputation point really is one of the main motivators behind the lack of downvoting, then I guess making it free or even cheaper is indeed the way to go.

How about not making it entirely free though, to keep a tiny safeguard in place? Like, making every 5 or 10 downvotes cost one point?

The normal rep count would continue to be displayed as an integer; for those who really need to know, the exact number could be displayed privately on the profile page, much like flag weight.

Just to offer another option. I'm not sure - completely free downvoting may indeed be the way to go. It would see more abuse as a tool in personal conflicts, but that happens already and the net benefit is likely to vastly overshadow that.

Source Link
Pekka
  • 114.5k
  • 70
  • 389
  • 640
Loading