Timeline for Lock questions within a few minutes of accepting an answer (or something similar)
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2018 at 16:56 | history | edited | Anne Daunted GoFundMonica | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
minor spelling, appropriate tags
|
| May 22, 2011 at 8:14 | comment | added | Cody Gray | I frequently post answers after an accept. They're usually damn good answers. Sometimes they get a bunch of upvotes, and eventually become the accepted answer. This site is not a forum: questions do not get "closed" just because they've been answered by one person. However, if you ever find yourself upset about them, just let me know. I'll be happy to delete them from any of your questions. | |
| May 22, 2011 at 2:16 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| May 22, 2011 at 2:07 | answer | added | Rick Sladkey | timeline score: 8 | |
| May 22, 2011 at 1:40 | comment | added | anon | Thanks everyone for your input I think the real issue here is proper moderation. My suggestion came from the fact that I've endured many situations where people have erroneously attacked my answers. It's not that in itself that is the issue, it's the quality of the comments I get. They should be moderated better. For example, I just finally gave in to a guy who posted over 20 comments attacking my answer and me personally, and sunk to his level and said some things offside and my account has been suspended. Frustration with not knowing what to do is what lead to this poor suggestion. | |
| May 22, 2011 at 1:35 | comment | added | user138231 | -1 because this would prevent me from getting some more Necromancer badges. | |
| May 22, 2011 at 1:22 | answer | added | dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten | timeline score: 8 | |
| May 22, 2011 at 1:10 | history | edited | anon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2487 characters in body; edited title
|
| May 22, 2011 at 1:03 | comment | added | Michael Petrotta | @Ascension, ranting doesn't add anything useful to your proposal. You'll just collect downvotes and detract from your nominal point. | |
| May 22, 2011 at 1:00 | comment | added | Adam Lear StaffMod | @Ascension Downvotes on meta mean disagreement with your proposal. See my answer for a potential explanation. | |
| May 22, 2011 at 0:59 | history | edited | anon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| May 22, 2011 at 0:59 | answer | added | Adam LearStaffMod | timeline score: 12 | |
| May 22, 2011 at 0:57 | comment | added | anon | If you're going to downvote would you mind explaining? | |
| May 22, 2011 at 0:53 | history | asked | anon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |