Skip to main content
deleted 2 characters in body
Source Link
Jeff Atwood
  • 311.4k
  • 107
  • 889
  • 1.3k

Not bumping through edits would prevent sediment churn, which means old (and possibly wrong) information would be left to fester and die in the bowels of the system -- unseen and unloved. That's much more toxic to our community than someone sacrificing a few reputation points.

Our CW threshold is quite generous; I suggest adapting your workflow to do smallerfewer, larger edits instead.

Remember: getting good information out into the world, and getting answers, are the real goal, not arbitrary points -- so we have to favor processes that further that goal.

Also, being a hybrid system, we have aspects of wiki (information-first) and traditional bulletin board / blog (owner-first), but there's always a tension in balancing those aspects of the system.

Not bumping through edits would prevent sediment churn, which means old (and possibly wrong) information would be left to fester and die in the bowels of the system -- unseen and unloved. That's much more toxic to our community than someone sacrificing a few reputation points.

Our CW threshold is quite generous; I suggest adapting your workflow to do smaller, larger edits instead.

Remember: getting good information out into the world, and getting answers, are the real goal, not arbitrary points -- so we have to favor processes that further that goal.

Also, being a hybrid system, we have aspects of wiki (information-first) and traditional bulletin board / blog (owner-first), but there's always a tension in balancing those aspects of the system.

Not bumping through edits would prevent sediment churn, which means old (and possibly wrong) information would be left to fester and die in the bowels of the system -- unseen and unloved. That's much more toxic to our community than someone sacrificing a few reputation points.

Our CW threshold is quite generous; I suggest adapting your workflow to do fewer, larger edits instead.

Remember: getting good information out into the world, and getting answers, are the real goal, not arbitrary points -- so we have to favor processes that further that goal.

Also, being a hybrid system, we have aspects of wiki (information-first) and traditional bulletin board / blog (owner-first), but there's always a tension in balancing those aspects of the system.

Source Link
Jeff Atwood
  • 311.4k
  • 107
  • 889
  • 1.3k

Not bumping through edits would prevent sediment churn, which means old (and possibly wrong) information would be left to fester and die in the bowels of the system -- unseen and unloved. That's much more toxic to our community than someone sacrificing a few reputation points.

Our CW threshold is quite generous; I suggest adapting your workflow to do smaller, larger edits instead.

Remember: getting good information out into the world, and getting answers, are the real goal, not arbitrary points -- so we have to favor processes that further that goal.

Also, being a hybrid system, we have aspects of wiki (information-first) and traditional bulletin board / blog (owner-first), but there's always a tension in balancing those aspects of the system.