Timeline for Don't allow suggested edits until post is one hour old
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2021 at 11:50 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://blog.stackoverflow.com with https://blog.stackoverflow.com
|
|
| Jul 2, 2011 at 21:03 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | @gilles I don't think that's a correct characterization of that answer.. | |
| Jul 2, 2011 at 15:24 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | Do you have statistics on the number of anonymous edits, the proportion that was accepted, and (that one's hard) the number that was worthwhile? The dominant attitude on Meta is that suggested edits, especially anonymous ones, should not change the meaning of a post, in particular not correcting mistakes. So I'm afraid more anonymous edits will only mean more rejections, not more improvements. | |
| Jul 2, 2011 at 7:09 | comment | added | Billy ONeal | I think part of this is that most of that long tail is interested in their own questions only... Most anyone who answers can get edit privies relatively quickly... | |
| Jul 2, 2011 at 6:33 | comment | added | Brad Mace | Fair enough, guess I just had bad luck to hit it a couple times. I feel like suggested edits haven't been very well advertised; I only discovered them the first time I went to edit and got the approval dialog. | |
| Jul 2, 2011 at 5:27 | vote | accept | Brad Mace | ||
| Jul 2, 2011 at 5:22 | history | answered | Jeff Atwood | CC BY-SA 3.0 |