Timeline for Anonymous user feedback now in testing
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2012 at 13:59 | comment | added | Ben Millwood | I agree with the latter comment, I had assumed the feedback button was a placebo :P | |
| Jul 17, 2011 at 0:01 | comment | added | badp | @Jeff That works too. Much better now, thanks. | |
| Jul 16, 2011 at 17:54 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | @badp excellent idea; even better how about just "feedback" | |
| Jul 16, 2011 at 11:32 | comment | added | badp | @Jeff How about "give feedback"? I agree "this answer was helpful" just seems to mean "you've already voted for this post stating it was helpful. Click here if you changed your mind." | |
| Jul 16, 2011 at 3:21 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | technically you're adding uppercase first char and a ? which makes it noisy to my eye. | |
| Jul 15, 2011 at 12:30 | comment | added | Kobi | @Jeff - I'm not worried about double voting, but about seeing the result of my action. As for the first point: "This answer was helpful" doesn't look like it's asking me to vote. How about "Was this answer helpful?" - just adding a question mark. | |
| Jul 15, 2011 at 10:23 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | Far too noisy to have so much text repeated on the page over and over. I believe we ignore repeated votes from the same IP, so no need to worry about double voting. | |
| Jul 15, 2011 at 9:54 | history | answered | Kobi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |