Timeline for Anonymous user feedback now in testing
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Apr 23, 2014 at 13:45 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
Apr 23, 2014 at 9:28 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
Jul 15, 2011 at 15:46 | comment | added | Robert Cartaino | @Jeff: I'm not sure I agree with the premise of a pending, convertible future vote (yet). Part of earning reputation is to defer abilities until you have experience to use them properly. New users are not necessarily voting for the "right reasons" that comes with experience. In the US we don't let minors vote until they have the experience and maturity to make such a decision. Likewise, we don't let 16-year olds cast "fake" votes convertible to real votes should the candidate run for re-election. In time, facts change, posts are edited, better answers added. Votes should be cast in real-time. | |
Jul 15, 2011 at 11:46 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | not a bad idea, but only really possible once you hold at least an unregistered (cookie based) account at 1 rep. For true anons, who have yet to ask or answer anything, this would be extremely difficult. | |
Jul 15, 2011 at 11:36 | comment | added | Jan Fabry | @Brock Adams: The tracking would probably be cookie based, similar to how anonymous users are tracked now, no? I would not count downvotes (similar to how you can't downvote until you have 125 rep, or can't downvote comments). (I see a difference between an answer that was not helpful and one that really deserves a downvote) | |
Jul 15, 2011 at 10:48 | comment | added | Awesome Poodles | Sounds good, but how would you register/track these votes? By IP? The first guy to set up an account from a large, corporate, NAT-protected IP could get credit for a lot of votes. Maybe okay for up-votes. Bad-news for down-votes. | |
Jul 15, 2011 at 10:07 | history | answered | Jan Fabry | CC BY-SA 3.0 |