Timeline for The inevitable downvote on meta?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2021 at 12:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://data.stackexchange.com/ with https://data.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:59 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Sep 16, 2011 at 1:42 | history | unlocked | waffles | ||
| Jul 27, 2011 at 2:51 | history | locked | user102937 | ||
| Jul 27, 2011 at 2:18 | comment | added | 千里ちゃん | This is a bad answer because it doesn't include closed and locked threads. The external link manipulates statistics. 4% is a huge number, btw. @anna, How would you feel if I called you a bitch? Then, I called you crap? Then when you complained about it, you found I was the person you were filing the complaint with? And I said, "Oh, I never called you a bitch. Also, you should feel bad because you're too stupid to understand that I just meant you're fluff when I said you're crap." Then, I banned your account.... This is what happens to countless users. So, an ignore feature is required. | |
| Jul 27, 2011 at 2:01 | comment | added | 千里ちゃん | @anna, anyone who doesn't themselves have a conflict of interest can see that there is one and knows that that is wrong. People who do have a conflict of interest are going to act on it because that's the nature of people. So, you can expect them to automatically downvote, suspend, and then ban anyone who doesn't sit idly by while they abuse their authority by cursing at people. | |
| Jul 27, 2011 at 2:00 | comment | added | 千里ちゃん | @anna, in fact, when I look for the names of people who have been banned for asking questions about suspensions on this site, I find that their user names don't even show up in search. They go to one site on Stack Exchange where users are a little obnoxious. They run into one user who is REALLY obnoxious (turns out it's a moderator at meta). Then they come here and complain, not knowing what to do, and they 15 obnoxious users. It's stressful enough to deal with one, now there are 15, and one is the guy who bothered them in the first place. We should have a higher standard. | |
| Jul 27, 2011 at 1:57 | comment | added | 千里ちゃん | @anna, yes I have several examples. I have friends who have had the same issue with this site. meta.stackexchange.com/questions/67628/… is kind of an example. There are other examples that I have seen, but how am I supposed to show them when they've been closed and deleted? The moderators just cover their tracks after they abuse people. | |
| Jul 26, 2011 at 14:22 | comment | added | Adam Lear StaffMod | @千里ちゃん Err, what? Do you actually have specific examples of that happening? The odds of a moderator being the same as some other high-rep users are pretty low. Earning rep is not so easy that one would want to have two separate high-rep accounts. | |
| Jul 26, 2011 at 13:39 | comment | added | Cody Gray | Yup. Obviously this site is not for you. Too bad. Fortunately, there are a lot of other unmoderated places on the Internet that you can hang out instead where absolutely anything goes. Sounds like you'd like that better. | |
| Jul 26, 2011 at 10:19 | comment | added | 千里ちゃん | I can point you to post, after post, after post, after post where users have been upset about some high-ranking guy who's come through and harassed them. The moderator comes in (probably the same person who is being abusive in the first place), takes one look, jumps on the band wagon, and commits to taking away all of the affected user's privileges. Then, the user is permanently banned from asking questions. Case after case, let's call it a trend, but the 'community' ignores them. Really, all of these people count as the community. They have no say in the matter. They're muted. | |
| Jul 26, 2011 at 10:17 | comment | added | 千里ちゃん | Michael, I wonder if feature requests ever pass, even if they are upvoted, because the 'ignore' feature request has huge upvote value, and it has for a long time. It hasn't gotten any attention, though. Rather than people stalking me and bothering me, they could ignore me if they don't like me. Then, I would just have to suffer without their help. It would be too bad for me because I wouldn't have their skillful answering to guide me, and it would be equally as discouraging as a downvote. Only, it wouldn't ignite tempers as the downvoting system is proven to. | |
| Jul 26, 2011 at 4:08 | history | answered | Michael Mrozek | CC BY-SA 3.0 |