Possible Duplicate:
The current review system encourages faux reviews: some people upvote everything rather than actually fixing it
Unfortunately, there are some users that want to review as much in as little time, choosing the easiest option: Vote, Looks good or Approve. I have seen users reviewing more than 5 posts within 20 seconds.
Editing posts is often needed but this takes more time and the editor often sees several other quick reviews when finishing the edit (Firsts posts and Late answers) so the I'm done button is no longer available.
This is annoying, but it also works counterproductively. The incentive to perform the needed edits is decreased while this kind of behaviour should be encouraged.
So, I would like to suggest the following improvement to the review system:
- If a person edits a post, during review, and the edit is substantial, then it counts as a review.
And I think we need a way to stop the trigger happy reviewers, possibly using a timed delay.
First Post
orLate Answer
instead of only voting if required. Mostly inFirst Post
, I need to do too many changes. If I don't complete editing within 10-15 seconds, I find NEXT button only as it is already voted and reviewed by someone else.