We judge questions on their technical merits:
- Is the question clear and on topic?
- Is enough information provided for others to accurately answer the question?
- Will this question help anyone else in the future? Is it a real problem or just an artifact of a typo?
If the answer to the above is yes on all counts, then it's a good question for the site. It's not up to us to examine the motive of the question author beyond our own inclination to answer the question or move on. Legal stuff is way beyond our pay grade.
A common manifestation of this is Woah, man, you're totally violating the Apple NDA! or perhaps the user is violating some kind of cyber crime law that some country has passed. That stuff is far out of the scope of what we expect from users of Stack Overflow, we simply ask that you share your expertise on questions that interest you. In fact, it's even out of the scope of moderation - we aren't equipped or trained to examine the legal merits of a question.
I'm not telling you to not flag things that you think need our attention, but we're not going to take action on a post on advice given from one non-lawyer to another. If you see a bar fight break out under such a question, then of course the correct course of action is to involve a moderator.
In short, don't take on unnecessary angst - just answer questions you feel good about and alert us to things that don't meet our quality standards, or instances where you see people not behaving at their best.
For everything else, we have lawyers and clear channels for third parties to communicate with them.