Actually, yeah. This was a great question from a research effort stance, but it left the answerers with very little to work with. Just... "uhhh yep, looks good? What were you worried about?" Would be very helpful if you answered one of these questions:
- "I ran it and it worked, but here's why I'm concerned I didn't do it right."
- "I couldn't run it for this reason."
- "I ran it and it didn't work right, here's the problem I had."
So take this as a "light closure, as in, not quite answerable, improve it a little and it can be reopened. I do sympathize that it's somewhat problematic it got closed before you had any chance to improve it, but alas, that is our current workflow - and if you do make this improvement it can be easily reopened. Please don't take this too personally, we need members like you who are willing to put up with a certain amount of B.S. so we can, for instance, improve our close-workflow.