"But after emailing them yesterday, Aug. 25, I got no response or acknowledgment." hmm... maybe wait for a week for a response from CMs?

I'm not sure if it's an appropriate way to do it... but why didn't try filling the form twice? In the first form fill the starting details and in the second form, mention that it's continuation of your previous tickets. I think the CMs can group the tickets together and analyse your ticket.

"Additionally, is there a way to verify whether I've imported the data correctly into my MySQL database?" That's out of scope of MSE AFAIK.

Is staff label being changed to admin label?

@Piper Thanks for the information :)

We now have sort for bountied answers in a question page?

@BryanKrause I don't think there's a specific meaning for 'willing' in Indian English.

It would be nice if we could feature this post, but unfortunately there's not much information for non-mods here. But since the old policy is revoked is due to this post, I think it's OK to feature this post. Maybe un-feature this post: Stack Overflow at WeAreDevelopers World Congress in Berlin and feature this.

@ResistanceIsFutile Well, but the difference this time is SE is willing to disclose the heuristics (if mods agree). I don't think SE is willing to disclose other stuff like serial voting detection criteria (even if the mods agree). So, it paints a weird picture.

For non-mods, this interim policy is just a secret and empty policy, but I guess there are strong reasons why mods didn't want the heuristics to be published. It would be nice if the mods/negotiators explain their reasons for not wanting it to be published.

Who are the "negotiators for the Moderators"? I think that can be publicly announced. Are they the ones who represented the community during the strike (Mithical, Cody Gray and Makyen)?