Revisions to Serial flag decliner

replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/

Source Link

edited Mar 20, 2017 at 10:30

1

Looking back at one of my previous questions here at meta I feel like I was hit by serial flag decliner (someone who makes a large number of questionable declines questionable declines of flags in a row):

Was it a mistake to flag these answers?Was it a mistake to flag these answers?

Wonder if this kind of issue can happen on Stack Overflow?

update

Recently discovered another example of large number of questionable declines of flags in a row. The issue was discussed and resolved at SU meta:

Reason for flags declined?
in brief, decline of ~20 flags in the row was cast on heavyweight flagger...

...acted with the best of intentions (as evidenced to some extent by my 700+ flag weight before this), in accordance with many meta posts, and made it clear, in act (this was not the first time I flagged so many things) and in word (I made a post asking for more flags) that this is what I was going to do to a greater or lesser extent...

Per my reading, conclusion at SU Meta was that the issue was caused by misunderstanding and some miscommunication. As for the flags affected by the unfortunate series of declines, these were considered extreme circumstance and as such were removed by a dev modifying the database.

Looking back at one of my previous questions here at meta I feel like I was hit by serial flag decliner (someone who makes a large number of questionable declines of flags in a row):

Was it a mistake to flag these answers?

Wonder if this kind of issue can happen on Stack Overflow?

update

Recently discovered another example of large number of questionable declines of flags in a row. The issue was discussed and resolved at SU meta:

Reason for flags declined?
in brief, decline of ~20 flags in the row was cast on heavyweight flagger...

...acted with the best of intentions (as evidenced to some extent by my 700+ flag weight before this), in accordance with many meta posts, and made it clear, in act (this was not the first time I flagged so many things) and in word (I made a post asking for more flags) that this is what I was going to do to a greater or lesser extent...

Per my reading, conclusion at SU Meta was that the issue was caused by misunderstanding and some miscommunication. As for the flags affected by the unfortunate series of declines, these were considered extreme circumstance and as such were removed by a dev modifying the database.

Looking back at one of my previous questions here at meta I feel like I was hit by serial flag decliner (someone who makes a large number of questionable declines of flags in a row):

Was it a mistake to flag these answers?

Wonder if this kind of issue can happen on Stack Overflow?

update

Recently discovered another example of large number of questionable declines of flags in a row. The issue was discussed and resolved at SU meta:

Reason for flags declined?
in brief, decline of ~20 flags in the row was cast on heavyweight flagger...

...acted with the best of intentions (as evidenced to some extent by my 700+ flag weight before this), in accordance with many meta posts, and made it clear, in act (this was not the first time I flagged so many things) and in word (I made a post asking for more flags) that this is what I was going to do to a greater or lesser extent...

Per my reading, conclusion at SU Meta was that the issue was caused by misunderstanding and some miscommunication. As for the flags affected by the unfortunate series of declines, these were considered extreme circumstance and as such were removed by a dev modifying the database.

replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/

Source Link

edited Mar 17, 2017 at 10:12

Community Bot

1

Looking back at one of my previous questions here at meta I feel like I was hit by serial flag decliner (someone who makes a large number of questionable declines of flags in a row):

Was it a mistake to flag these answers?

Wonder if this kind of issue can happen on Stack Overflow?

update

Recently discovered another example of large number of questionable declines of flags in a row. The issue was discussed and resolved at SU meta:

Reason for flags declined?Reason for flags declined?
in brief, decline of ~20 flags in the row was cast on heavyweight flagger...

...acted with the best of intentions (as evidenced to some extent by my 700+ flag weight before this), in accordance with many meta posts, and made it clear, in act (this was not the first time I flagged so many things) and in word (I made a post asking for more flags) that this is what I was going to do to a greater or lesser extent...

Per my reading, conclusion at SU Meta was that the issue was caused by misunderstanding and some miscommunication. As for the flags affected by the unfortunate series of declines, these were considered extreme circumstance and as such were removed by a dev modifying the database.

Looking back at one of my previous questions here at meta I feel like I was hit by serial flag decliner (someone who makes a large number of questionable declines of flags in a row):

Was it a mistake to flag these answers?

Wonder if this kind of issue can happen on Stack Overflow?

update

Recently discovered another example of large number of questionable declines of flags in a row. The issue was discussed and resolved at SU meta:

Reason for flags declined?
in brief, decline of ~20 flags in the row was cast on heavyweight flagger...

...acted with the best of intentions (as evidenced to some extent by my 700+ flag weight before this), in accordance with many meta posts, and made it clear, in act (this was not the first time I flagged so many things) and in word (I made a post asking for more flags) that this is what I was going to do to a greater or lesser extent...

Per my reading, conclusion at SU Meta was that the issue was caused by misunderstanding and some miscommunication. As for the flags affected by the unfortunate series of declines, these were considered extreme circumstance and as such were removed by a dev modifying the database.

Looking back at one of my previous questions here at meta I feel like I was hit by serial flag decliner (someone who makes a large number of questionable declines of flags in a row):

Was it a mistake to flag these answers?

Wonder if this kind of issue can happen on Stack Overflow?

update

Recently discovered another example of large number of questionable declines of flags in a row. The issue was discussed and resolved at SU meta:

Reason for flags declined?
in brief, decline of ~20 flags in the row was cast on heavyweight flagger...

...acted with the best of intentions (as evidenced to some extent by my 700+ flag weight before this), in accordance with many meta posts, and made it clear, in act (this was not the first time I flagged so many things) and in word (I made a post asking for more flags) that this is what I was going to do to a greater or lesser extent...

Per my reading, conclusion at SU Meta was that the issue was caused by misunderstanding and some miscommunication. As for the flags affected by the unfortunate series of declines, these were considered extreme circumstance and as such were removed by a dev modifying the database.

Migration of MSO links to MSE links

Source Link

edited Apr 24, 2014 at 13:32

Community Bot

1

Looking back at one of my previous questions here at meta I feel like I was hit by serial flag decliner (someone who makes a large number of questionable declines questionable declines of flags in a row):

http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/109383/was-it-a-mistake-to-flag-these-answers Was it a mistake to flag these answers?

Wonder if this kind of issue can happen on Stack Overflow?

update

Recently discovered another example of large number of questionable declines of flags in a row. The issue was discussed and resolved at SU meta:

Reason for flags declined?
in brief, decline of ~20 flags in the row was cast on heavyweight flagger...

...acted with the best of intentions (as evidenced to some extent by my 700+ flag weight before this), in accordance with many meta posts, and made it clear, in act (this was not the first time I flagged so many things) and in word (I made a post asking for more flags) that this is what I was going to do to a greater or lesser extent...

Per my reading, conclusion at SU Meta was that the issue was caused by misunderstanding and some miscommunication. As for the flags affected by the unfortunate series of declines, these were considered extreme circumstance and as such were removed by a dev modifying the database.

Looking back at one of my previous questions here at meta I feel like I was hit by serial flag decliner (someone who makes a large number of questionable declines of flags in a row):

http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/109383/was-it-a-mistake-to-flag-these-answers

Wonder if this kind of issue can happen on Stack Overflow?

update

Recently discovered another example of large number of questionable declines of flags in a row. The issue was discussed and resolved at SU meta:

Reason for flags declined?
in brief, decline of ~20 flags in the row was cast on heavyweight flagger...

...acted with the best of intentions (as evidenced to some extent by my 700+ flag weight before this), in accordance with many meta posts, and made it clear, in act (this was not the first time I flagged so many things) and in word (I made a post asking for more flags) that this is what I was going to do to a greater or lesser extent...

Per my reading, conclusion at SU Meta was that the issue was caused by misunderstanding and some miscommunication. As for the flags affected by the unfortunate series of declines, these were considered extreme circumstance and as such were removed by a dev modifying the database.

Looking back at one of my previous questions here at meta I feel like I was hit by serial flag decliner (someone who makes a large number of questionable declines of flags in a row):

Was it a mistake to flag these answers?

Wonder if this kind of issue can happen on Stack Overflow?

update

Recently discovered another example of large number of questionable declines of flags in a row. The issue was discussed and resolved at SU meta:

Reason for flags declined?
in brief, decline of ~20 flags in the row was cast on heavyweight flagger...

...acted with the best of intentions (as evidenced to some extent by my 700+ flag weight before this), in accordance with many meta posts, and made it clear, in act (this was not the first time I flagged so many things) and in word (I made a post asking for more flags) that this is what I was going to do to a greater or lesser extent...

Per my reading, conclusion at SU Meta was that the issue was caused by misunderstanding and some miscommunication. As for the flags affected by the unfortunate series of declines, these were considered extreme circumstance and as such were removed by a dev modifying the database.