Skip to main content
46 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 13, 2023 at 22:31 history edited Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog CC BY-SA 4.0
Per comments, even though the script interval was changed, the concern and flag wait time hasn't changed
Oct 12, 2023 at 18:49 history edited Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 25 characters in body
Oct 12, 2023 at 16:31 history edited CatijaStaff CC BY-SA 4.0
The script was updated to run hourly when some mod tools were improved.
Aug 18, 2023 at 4:08 history edited Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog CC BY-SA 4.0
added 96 characters in body; deleted 1 character in body
May 29, 2022 at 10:49 comment added convert So just as side note, the site itself sometimes provokes for such behavior. I mean there are bages you earn for voting, specially the ones where you have to vote some number of times in a day.
May 29, 2022 at 10:39 comment added convert "The most common type of voting fraud is when a single user continually upvotes or downvotes many of your posts within a short period of time." What is meaned by many 2, 3...100? What is a short period, hours, days or month?
Mar 16, 2022 at 3:21 comment added user1101587 What if the user liked all our posts and upvoted it, Can't I get back my votes again?
Nov 28, 2021 at 8:30 history edited Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog CC BY-SA 4.0
added 18 characters in body
May 4, 2021 at 10:20 comment added Devolus Shouldn't serial voting be rather obvious to the user anyway? I mean, if I suddenly get a whole bunch of upvotes for older postings of mine, I would be a bit suspicious about it. Most of the time, you get most upvotes in a certain period when the question is still active (probably in the first 24h hours). After that, it subsides.
May 4, 2021 at 0:59 history edited Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog CC BY-SA 4.0
Split off the extra text into a new section, to simplify it
May 3, 2021 at 18:41 history edited Makyen CC BY-SA 4.0
Update length of delay from escalation to resolution (next business day just doesn't happen and it's bad to set expectations that it will). Add considerable text regarding the process of handling the flag and escalation.
May 3, 2021 at 17:34 history edited Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog CC BY-SA 4.0
added 683 characters in body
Mar 17, 2021 at 11:34 comment added Katie I would like to suggest that when someone gets significantly serial voted (as I was yesterday +200 points) and then it is reversed, that they get a one-time badge, just to cheer them up after all the drama in which they had no part :)
Mar 15, 2021 at 11:11 comment added Gulzar Is there a way to know which post's votes was corrected by the system? I do like to keep track of which of my posts perform best. I just got my first ever -10 correction, and would like to know for which post that happened.
Feb 4, 2021 at 3:38 comment added musicamante "the only form of notification [...] is "+1 undownvoted" [...] [but] if they only downvoted questions [...], they will not be notified". This is an interesting matter. I agree with the concept behind which downvoting questions doesn't change reputation, but since it does change reputation on the "target" (no matter if it's reinstated back then) and the "perpetrator" doesn't get any notification about the abuse it just seems to me like a "throwing the rock" while passing as innocent: I get that someone was somehow offended and I don't know why, but s|he just goes on knowing that s|he can.
Jan 31, 2021 at 23:09 history edited mgkrebbs CC BY-SA 4.0
word usage fix
Jan 18, 2021 at 11:34 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://chat.stackexchange.com with https://chat.stackexchange.com
Nov 30, 2020 at 20:06 comment added Red When serial votes don't get reversed, are flagged, the flag is marked as helpful, later the votes get reversed, does that ensure that the serial voter got a private message telling them to stop?
Jul 22, 2020 at 7:29 comment added brainchild Serial voting is explained as a succession of votes cast by one user toward another within a short span of time. Any behavior that would be abusive if done quickly, however, would seem equally abusive if done slowly. Indeed, the above indicates that some user may recast the same votes later, without any prevention unless the span again would be short. Any user only slightly cleverer than the dimmest, it seems, may evade the system only by casting votes at greater intervals. Would then a better system not analyze the behavior of a user without any distinction according to time span?
Jul 1, 2020 at 3:39 history edited Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog CC BY-SA 4.0
added 392 characters in body; added 2 characters in body
Jun 3, 2020 at 13:30 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Jul 19, 2018 at 8:33 history edited klutt CC BY-SA 4.0
added 50 characters in body
S Apr 22, 2017 at 18:34 history suggested CommunityBot CC BY-SA 3.0
grammar corrections, make more concise
Apr 22, 2017 at 17:33 review Suggested edits
S Apr 22, 2017 at 18:34
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:30 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Dec 17, 2015 at 20:07 history edited animusonStaffMod CC BY-SA 3.0
added 165 characters in body
May 5, 2015 at 5:32 history edited Nemo CC BY-SA 3.0
Link the other FAQ
Apr 3, 2015 at 22:03 history edited hichris123 CC BY-SA 3.0
Update wording
Dec 16, 2014 at 2:46 history edited animusonStaffMod CC BY-SA 3.0
Just remove the ask in chat thing. We generally don't care to be bothered just to look and see if something is gonna happen. Just wait and see if it happens. Also try to avoid having users ask on Meta.
Dec 15, 2014 at 20:36 history edited ɥʇǝS CC BY-SA 3.0
somone was confused because they went to the tavern and got brushed off, updating that so more people don't get confused. Esp. because few moderators hang on in the Tavern anymore.
Jul 29, 2014 at 16:59 review Suggested edits
Jul 29, 2014 at 18:30
Apr 24, 2014 at 13:33 history edited CommunityBot
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
Mar 12, 2014 at 20:59 history edited TylerH CC BY-SA 3.0
fixed a small typo and removed a redundant word
Dec 18, 2013 at 15:35 history edited Danny Beckett CC BY-SA 3.0
added 147 characters in body
Oct 30, 2013 at 2:11 history edited animusonStaffMod CC BY-SA 3.0
Expanded to include some information from the comments. Clean-up.
Oct 30, 2013 at 1:05 history edited Qantas 94 Heavy CC BY-SA 3.0
added 13 characters in body
Jul 24, 2013 at 17:18 history edited Ben Grossmann CC BY-SA 3.0
Heading format ("deleted posts")
Jun 29, 2013 at 16:40 history edited animusonStaffMod CC BY-SA 3.0
Last title was just too long, looked weird.
Jun 29, 2013 at 16:29 history edited animusonStaffMod CC BY-SA 3.0
added 330 characters in body
May 2, 2013 at 2:31 history edited Kyle Strand CC BY-SA 3.0
Corrected `-1 undownvote` to `+1 undownvote` to match logic, reason, and the example given
Jan 9, 2013 at 8:52 history edited gnat CC BY-SA 3.0
Does the system detect voting fraud in deleted posts?
Oct 7, 2012 at 0:46 history edited animusonStaffMod CC BY-SA 3.0
It should run every day at 03:00
May 8, 2012 at 12:43 history edited Clive CC BY-SA 3.0
Adding new section as per TheEstablishment's comment here: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/131795/serial-up-voting-and-reputation-cap#comment-363897
May 7, 2012 at 9:28 vote accept Cody Gray
S Mar 25, 2012 at 18:10 history answered animusonStaffMod CC BY-SA 3.0
S Mar 25, 2012 at 18:10 history made wiki Post Made Community Wiki by animusonStaffMod