Timeline for What is serial voting and how does it affect me?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
46 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 13, 2023 at 22:31 | history | edited | Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Per comments, even though the script interval was changed, the concern and flag wait time hasn't changed
|
Oct 12, 2023 at 18:49 | history | edited | Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 25 characters in body
|
Oct 12, 2023 at 16:31 | history | edited | CatijaStaff | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
The script was updated to run hourly when some mod tools were improved.
|
Aug 18, 2023 at 4:08 | history | edited | Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 96 characters in body; deleted 1 character in body
|
May 29, 2022 at 10:49 | comment | added | convert | So just as side note, the site itself sometimes provokes for such behavior. I mean there are bages you earn for voting, specially the ones where you have to vote some number of times in a day. | |
May 29, 2022 at 10:39 | comment | added | convert | "The most common type of voting fraud is when a single user continually upvotes or downvotes many of your posts within a short period of time." What is meaned by many 2, 3...100? What is a short period, hours, days or month? | |
Mar 16, 2022 at 3:21 | comment | added | user1101587 | What if the user liked all our posts and upvoted it, Can't I get back my votes again? | |
Nov 28, 2021 at 8:30 | history | edited | Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 18 characters in body
|
May 4, 2021 at 10:20 | comment | added | Devolus | Shouldn't serial voting be rather obvious to the user anyway? I mean, if I suddenly get a whole bunch of upvotes for older postings of mine, I would be a bit suspicious about it. Most of the time, you get most upvotes in a certain period when the question is still active (probably in the first 24h hours). After that, it subsides. | |
May 4, 2021 at 0:59 | history | edited | Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Split off the extra text into a new section, to simplify it
|
May 3, 2021 at 18:41 | history | edited | Makyen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Update length of delay from escalation to resolution (next business day just doesn't happen and it's bad to set expectations that it will). Add considerable text regarding the process of handling the flag and escalation.
|
May 3, 2021 at 17:34 | history | edited | Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 683 characters in body
|
Mar 17, 2021 at 11:34 | comment | added | Katie | I would like to suggest that when someone gets significantly serial voted (as I was yesterday +200 points) and then it is reversed, that they get a one-time badge, just to cheer them up after all the drama in which they had no part :) | |
Mar 15, 2021 at 11:11 | comment | added | Gulzar | Is there a way to know which post's votes was corrected by the system? I do like to keep track of which of my posts perform best. I just got my first ever -10 correction, and would like to know for which post that happened. | |
Feb 4, 2021 at 3:38 | comment | added | musicamante | "the only form of notification [...] is "+1 undownvoted" [...] [but] if they only downvoted questions [...], they will not be notified". This is an interesting matter. I agree with the concept behind which downvoting questions doesn't change reputation, but since it does change reputation on the "target" (no matter if it's reinstated back then) and the "perpetrator" doesn't get any notification about the abuse it just seems to me like a "throwing the rock" while passing as innocent: I get that someone was somehow offended and I don't know why, but s|he just goes on knowing that s|he can. | |
Jan 31, 2021 at 23:09 | history | edited | mgkrebbs | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
word usage fix
|
Jan 18, 2021 at 11:34 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://chat.stackexchange.com with https://chat.stackexchange.com
|
|
Nov 30, 2020 at 20:06 | comment | added | Red | When serial votes don't get reversed, are flagged, the flag is marked as helpful, later the votes get reversed, does that ensure that the serial voter got a private message telling them to stop? | |
Jul 22, 2020 at 7:29 | comment | added | brainchild | Serial voting is explained as a succession of votes cast by one user toward another within a short span of time. Any behavior that would be abusive if done quickly, however, would seem equally abusive if done slowly. Indeed, the above indicates that some user may recast the same votes later, without any prevention unless the span again would be short. Any user only slightly cleverer than the dimmest, it seems, may evade the system only by casting votes at greater intervals. Would then a better system not analyze the behavior of a user without any distinction according to time span? | |
Jul 1, 2020 at 3:39 | history | edited | Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 392 characters in body; added 2 characters in body
|
Jun 3, 2020 at 13:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
Jul 19, 2018 at 8:33 | history | edited | klutt | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 50 characters in body
|
S Apr 22, 2017 at 18:34 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
grammar corrections, make more concise
|
Apr 22, 2017 at 17:33 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Apr 22, 2017 at 18:34 | |||||
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Dec 17, 2015 at 20:07 | history | edited | animusonStaffMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 165 characters in body
|
May 5, 2015 at 5:32 | history | edited | Nemo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Link the other FAQ
|
Apr 3, 2015 at 22:03 | history | edited | hichris123 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Update wording
|
Dec 16, 2014 at 2:46 | history | edited | animusonStaffMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Just remove the ask in chat thing. We generally don't care to be bothered just to look and see if something is gonna happen. Just wait and see if it happens. Also try to avoid having users ask on Meta.
|
Dec 15, 2014 at 20:36 | history | edited | ɥʇǝS | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
somone was confused because they went to the tavern and got brushed off, updating that so more people don't get confused. Esp. because few moderators hang on in the Tavern anymore.
|
Jul 29, 2014 at 16:59 | review | Suggested edits | |||
Jul 29, 2014 at 18:30 | |||||
Apr 24, 2014 at 13:33 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
Mar 12, 2014 at 20:59 | history | edited | TylerH | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed a small typo and removed a redundant word
|
Dec 18, 2013 at 15:35 | history | edited | Danny Beckett | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 147 characters in body
|
Oct 30, 2013 at 2:11 | history | edited | animusonStaffMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Expanded to include some information from the comments. Clean-up.
|
Oct 30, 2013 at 1:05 | history | edited | Qantas 94 Heavy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 13 characters in body
|
Jul 24, 2013 at 17:18 | history | edited | Ben Grossmann | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Heading format ("deleted posts")
|
Jun 29, 2013 at 16:40 | history | edited | animusonStaffMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Last title was just too long, looked weird.
|
Jun 29, 2013 at 16:29 | history | edited | animusonStaffMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 330 characters in body
|
May 2, 2013 at 2:31 | history | edited | Kyle Strand | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Corrected `-1 undownvote` to `+1 undownvote` to match logic, reason, and the example given
|
Jan 9, 2013 at 8:52 | history | edited | gnat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Does the system detect voting fraud in deleted posts?
|
Oct 7, 2012 at 0:46 | history | edited | animusonStaffMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
It should run every day at 03:00
|
May 8, 2012 at 12:43 | history | edited | Clive | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Adding new section as per TheEstablishment's comment here: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/131795/serial-up-voting-and-reputation-cap#comment-363897
|
May 7, 2012 at 9:28 | vote | accept | Cody Gray | ||
S Mar 25, 2012 at 18:10 | history | answered | animusonStaffMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 | |
S Mar 25, 2012 at 18:10 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by animusonStaffMod |