Skip to main content
Post Deleted by CommunityBot
Post Locked by CommunityBot
Post Migrated Away to meta.stackoverflow.com by user50049
Post Closed as "Not suitable for this site" by user50049
Post Reopened by user50049
Post Closed as "Not suitable for this site" by mhlester, Undo, ɥʇǝS, user206222, mmyers
edited title
Link
bobobobo
  • 13.7k
  • 2
  • 43
  • 61

Is [language-lawyer]... Seriously really an effective characterization, or a borderline meta-tag?

Source Link
user102937
user102937

[language-lawyer]... Seriously?

For questions about the intricacies of formal or authoritative specifications of programming languages and environments. Typical questions concern gaps between "what will usually work in practice" and "what the spec actually guarantees", but problems with understanding the structure of the spec are also on topic.

This tag just rubs me the wrong way. Is it really an effective characterization, or a borderline meta-tag?