Skip to main content
Meta Stack Exchange

Return to Question

replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1

I wrote the question Assembly: C++ stack variable addresses different/wrong?Assembly: C++ stack variable addresses different/wrong?, and it was closed as not a real question.

The FAQ says

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, see the FAQ.

The question isn't ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical. I supplied code and assembly and tagged it as an assembly question. It is reasonably answerable in its current form.

What is the problem with the question?

I wrote the question Assembly: C++ stack variable addresses different/wrong?, and it was closed as not a real question.

The FAQ says

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, see the FAQ.

The question isn't ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical. I supplied code and assembly and tagged it as an assembly question. It is reasonably answerable in its current form.

What is the problem with the question?

I wrote the question Assembly: C++ stack variable addresses different/wrong?, and it was closed as not a real question.

The FAQ says

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, see the FAQ.

The question isn't ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical. I supplied code and assembly and tagged it as an assembly question. It is reasonably answerable in its current form.

What is the problem with the question?

added 2 characters in body; added 10 characters in body
Source Link
This_is_NOT_a_forum
This_is_NOT_a_forum
  • 6.7k
  • 4
  • 37
  • 55

I wrote the question Assembly: C++ stack variable addresses different/wrong?, and it was closed as not a real question.

The faqFAQ says

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, see the FAQ.

ItThe question isn't ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical. I supplied code and assembly and tagged it as an assembly question. It is reasonably answerable in its current form.

What is the problem with the question?

I wrote the question Assembly: C++ stack variable addresses different/wrong? and it was closed as not a real question

The faq says

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, see the FAQ.

It isn't ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical. I supplied code and assembly and tagged it as an assembly question. It is reasonably answerable in its current form.

What is the problem with the question?

I wrote the question Assembly: C++ stack variable addresses different/wrong?, and it was closed as not a real question.

The FAQ says

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, see the FAQ.

The question isn't ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical. I supplied code and assembly and tagged it as an assembly question. It is reasonably answerable in its current form.

What is the problem with the question?

Source Link
user34537
user34537

Why isn't this a real question? "Assembly: C++ stack variable addresses different/wrong?"

I wrote the question Assembly: C++ stack variable addresses different/wrong? and it was closed as not a real question

The faq says

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, see the FAQ.

It isn't ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical. I supplied code and assembly and tagged it as an assembly question. It is reasonably answerable in its current form.

What is the problem with the question?