Skip to main content
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
Source Link

I was just reading the question below,

What is Node.js?What is Node.js?

When, I noticed that, it was closed!, for "not being constructive" as says obviously; But just below that, it also says it is, protected assuming for the reasons that, it had some value to the community after-all.

My view is that, It should not have been protected, if it was closed as 'not constructive' first. Because, no one can post answers,

...but then if it was protected first, with the amount of upvotes and attention it had received, it wasn't certainly not constructive. humm??

What do you think

I was just reading the question below,

What is Node.js?

When, I noticed that, it was closed!, for "not being constructive" as says obviously; But just below that, it also says it is, protected assuming for the reasons that, it had some value to the community after-all.

My view is that, It should not have been protected, if it was closed as 'not constructive' first. Because, no one can post answers,

...but then if it was protected first, with the amount of upvotes and attention it had received, it wasn't certainly not constructive. humm??

What do you think

I was just reading the question below,

What is Node.js?

When, I noticed that, it was closed!, for "not being constructive" as says obviously; But just below that, it also says it is, protected assuming for the reasons that, it had some value to the community after-all.

My view is that, It should not have been protected, if it was closed as 'not constructive' first. Because, no one can post answers,

...but then if it was protected first, with the amount of upvotes and attention it had received, it wasn't certainly not constructive. humm??

What do you think

edited title
Link
Mysticial
  • 19.3k
  • 4
  • 69
  • 78

Blosed Closed as not constructive but Protected... conundrum?

Source Link
samayo
  • 650
  • 3
  • 16

Blosed as not constructive but Protected... conundrum?

I was just reading the question below,

What is Node.js?

When, I noticed that, it was closed!, for "not being constructive" as says obviously; But just below that, it also says it is, protected assuming for the reasons that, it had some value to the community after-all.

My view is that, It should not have been protected, if it was closed as 'not constructive' first. Because, no one can post answers,

...but then if it was protected first, with the amount of upvotes and attention it had received, it wasn't certainly not constructive. humm??

What do you think