Skip to main content
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
Source Link

In this answerthis answer (via this meta question) the poster links to two google search result pages as part of their answer.
Is this a reasonable thing to do, or should we be discouraging it?

It seems awfully close to lmgfy and surely there are always better sources which could be linked to...

related: Discourage 'google for it' answers, How should we deal with Google questions?

In this answer (via this meta question) the poster links to two google search result pages as part of their answer.
Is this a reasonable thing to do, or should we be discouraging it?

It seems awfully close to lmgfy and surely there are always better sources which could be linked to...

related: Discourage 'google for it' answers, How should we deal with Google questions?

In this answer (via this meta question) the poster links to two google search result pages as part of their answer.
Is this a reasonable thing to do, or should we be discouraging it?

It seems awfully close to lmgfy and surely there are always better sources which could be linked to...

related: Discourage 'google for it' answers, How should we deal with Google questions?

replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

In this answer (via this meta questionmeta question) the poster links to two google search result pages as part of their answer.
Is this a reasonable thing to do, or should we be discouraging it?

It seems awfully close to lmgfylmgfy and surely there are always better sources which could be linked to...

related: Discourage 'google for it' answersDiscourage 'google for it' answers, How should we deal with Google questions?How should we deal with Google questions?

In this answer (via this meta question) the poster links to two google search result pages as part of their answer.
Is this a reasonable thing to do, or should we be discouraging it?

It seems awfully close to lmgfy and surely there are always better sources which could be linked to...

related: Discourage 'google for it' answers, How should we deal with Google questions?

In this answer (via this meta question) the poster links to two google search result pages as part of their answer.
Is this a reasonable thing to do, or should we be discouraging it?

It seems awfully close to lmgfy and surely there are always better sources which could be linked to...

related: Discourage 'google for it' answers, How should we deal with Google questions?

Migration of MSO links to MSE links
Source Link

In this answer (via this meta questionmeta question) the poster links to two google search result pages as part of their answer.
Is this a reasonable thing to do, or should we be discouraging it?

It seems awfully close to lmgfylmgfy and surely there are always better sources which could be linked to...

related: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/87652/discourage-google-for-it-answersDiscourage 'google for it' answers, http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/8724/how-should-we-deal-with-google-questionsHow should we deal with Google questions?

In this answer (via this meta question) the poster links to two google search result pages as part of their answer.
Is this a reasonable thing to do, or should we be discouraging it?

It seems awfully close to lmgfy and surely there are always better sources which could be linked to...

related: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/87652/discourage-google-for-it-answers, http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/8724/how-should-we-deal-with-google-questions

In this answer (via this meta question) the poster links to two google search result pages as part of their answer.
Is this a reasonable thing to do, or should we be discouraging it?

It seems awfully close to lmgfy and surely there are always better sources which could be linked to...

related: Discourage 'google for it' answers, How should we deal with Google questions?

Source Link
hayd
  • 2.7k
  • 23
  • 22
Loading