Timeline for URL Shorteners cleanup [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
25 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2020 at 13:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jul 22, 2018 at 6:08 | history | closed |
Nathan Tuggy Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog Ward - Trying Codidact Makyen Robert Longson |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Jul 21, 2018 at 23:56 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jul 22, 2018 at 6:08 | |||||
| Jul 21, 2018 at 23:38 | comment | added | Matt | Possible duplicate of Let Me Flag That For You - URL Shortener Cleanup | |
| Jul 21, 2018 at 15:21 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Jul 21, 2018 at 19:14 | |||||
| S Jul 20, 2018 at 23:14 | history | suggested | Matt | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Updated number
|
| Jul 20, 2018 at 21:47 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 20, 2018 at 23:14 | |||||
| May 23, 2017 at 12:36 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.webapps.stackexchange.com/ with https://webapps.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Nov 13, 2013 at 16:51 | vote | accept | TRiG | ||
| Nov 13, 2013 at 16:23 | answer | added | user213963 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 13, 2013 at 14:25 | history | edited | ale | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body; edited title
|
| Nov 13, 2013 at 14:24 | comment | added | ale | It used to be they were used to evade LMGTFY restrictions. | |
| Nov 13, 2013 at 14:16 | history | edited | Duncan Jones | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 64 characters in body
|
| Nov 13, 2013 at 12:33 | vote | accept | TRiG | ||
| Nov 13, 2013 at 16:51 | |||||
| Nov 10, 2013 at 19:28 | comment | added | Duncan Jones | Amazing how many of these short links are used to evade the jsfiddle code restrictions. | |
| Nov 10, 2013 at 2:43 | comment | added | Michael Hampton |
adf.ly should not be present at all; those are without exception all revenue-generating links. Well, of those five, four were questions about the adf.ly service; only one had inappropriate adfly links in it...
|
|
| Nov 9, 2013 at 19:48 | comment | added | Bernhard Barker | @JoshC "More reliable links" - yes, that makes sense - we're already dependent on whatever site we're linking to, we don't want to be dependent on another site unnecessarily. | |
| Nov 9, 2013 at 19:45 | comment | added | Bernhard Barker | Blacklist them and someone write a user script to convert them automatically (for future posts)? | |
| Nov 9, 2013 at 19:42 | answer | added | Cjxcz Odjcayrwl | timeline score: 25 | |
| Nov 9, 2013 at 18:56 | comment | added | Cole Tobin | @JoshC naybe | |
| Nov 9, 2013 at 18:51 | comment | added | Duncan Jones | This has been tried before.... Some useful links in the comments. | |
| Nov 9, 2013 at 18:28 | comment | added | Josh Crozier | I agree.. I'll clean some up. But what's the purpose of such a clean-up? It is for indexing purposes? More reliable links? Or is it because shortened URLS look like spam? As for cleaning them up, do you just swap it out for the absolute URL? | |
| Nov 9, 2013 at 18:18 | comment | added | Richard Tingle | Burn them! Burn them all! ....Ahem I mean I agree | |
| Nov 9, 2013 at 18:02 | history | asked | TRiG | CC BY-SA 3.0 |