Skip to main content
Meta Stack Exchange

Return to Question

minor grammar
Source Link
edit approved Feb 23, 2014 at 1:55
Daniel F. Thornton
edit approved Feb 23, 2014 at 1:55
Daniel F. Thornton
  • 163
  • 5

It's aan additional unnecessary burden to the honest stacker during suggested edit duty. A question presents some code then the minor editor adds a tag like 'for-loop' or 'forms'.

These tag typestags are so general that they only have a handful of followers. They are ofserve no useful purpose and are the cause of many too minor edits. Why not permit culling of generic tags?

It's a additional unnecessary burden to the honest stacker during suggested edit duty. A question presents some code then the minor editor adds a tag like 'for-loop' or 'forms'.

These tag types are so general that they only have a handful of followers. They are of no useful purpose and are the cause of many too minor edits. Why not permit culling of generic tags?

It's an additional unnecessary burden to the honest stacker during suggested edit duty. A question presents some code then the minor editor adds a tag like 'for-loop' or 'forms'.

These tags are so general that they only have a handful of followers. They serve no useful purpose and are the cause of many too minor edits. Why not permit culling of generic tags?

Notice removed Authoritative reference needed by Pekka
Bounty Ended with joeytje50's answer chosen by Pekka
Notice added Authoritative reference needed by Pekka
Bounty Started worth 500 reputation by Pekka
Source Link
suspectus
suspectus
  • 515
  • 4
  • 7

tags of mundanity that are gratuitously applied to posts

It's a additional unnecessary burden to the honest stacker during suggested edit duty. A question presents some code then the minor editor adds a tag like 'for-loop' or 'forms'.

These tag types are so general that they only have a handful of followers. They are of no useful purpose and are the cause of many too minor edits. Why not permit culling of generic tags?