Timeline for If I see a spam vandalism suggested edit, should I do anything extra about it?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 30, 2019 at 11:53 | answer | added | user447378 | timeline score: -3 | |
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://boardgames.stackexchange.com/ with https://boardgames.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Jul 2, 2014 at 21:27 | vote | accept | doppelgreener | ||
Jul 2, 2014 at 16:00 | answer | added | Grace NoteStaffMod | timeline score: 23 | |
Jul 2, 2014 at 14:06 | comment | added | doppelgreener | By spam flags do you mean spam/vandalism rejections? | |
Jul 2, 2014 at 14:01 | comment | added | fbueckert | I've brought it up to @GraceNote before. I believe the response is the spam flags tighten up the restrictions from that IP. | |
Jul 2, 2014 at 7:03 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | @NickStauner no penalty and those are usually submitted by anonymous visitors without any account. What it does is improving the auto block system though. | |
Jul 2, 2014 at 6:41 | comment | added | Nick Stauner | I'm curious too. Does marking an edit as vandalism confer any penalty to the user like a spam flag would? (Or is that impossible because the user is anonymous?) I see Tim Post's answer pointing in that direction, but it would be reassuring to know. | |
Jul 2, 2014 at 6:37 | comment | added | PeterJ | There's something related here about the e-mail address in edit summaries: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/207837/… | |
Jul 2, 2014 at 6:35 | history | edited | doppelgreener | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 17 characters in body
|
Jul 2, 2014 at 6:28 | history | asked | doppelgreener | CC BY-SA 3.0 |