Timeline for Building Rep on meta.stackexchange.com [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
29 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2018 at 19:00 | comment | added | faintsignal | It's odd that this meta site doesn't operate like any of the site-specific meta sites, in that expressing disagreement through voting is penalized. | |
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:29 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Dec 3, 2015 at 22:37 | comment | added | Kevin B | I'm out of rep again. /sigh | |
| Feb 23, 2015 at 21:27 | comment | added | Servy | @canon So either you are participating in meta.SE, in order to discusses issues pertaining to other SE sites that you're active, or you're not participating in meta.SE, even if you're participating on other SE sites, and have no need for rep on meta.SE. If you're actively participating on meta.SE to discuss issues about other sites, you'll earn rep on meta.SE if your contributions are valuable. And of course, no rep is need to ask or answer questions, which is the primary means of contributing. | |
| Feb 23, 2015 at 21:20 | comment | added | Servy | @canon It can be on topic to discuss issues pertaining to multiple sites, but in your specific question it's asking about meta.SE. You mention meta.SE by name, and discuss issues that are specific to meta.SE and that don't pertain to any other site. You could re-word the question such that it would make sense in the context of other sites, but that's not how its currently worded. | |
| Feb 23, 2015 at 21:12 | comment | added | Servy | @canon The question makes it very clear that it's specific to meta.SE, and not just "SE sites in general". | |
| Oct 27, 2014 at 20:56 | history | edited | canon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 28 characters in body
|
| Oct 27, 2014 at 20:39 | history | edited | canon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 198 characters in body
|
| Oct 27, 2014 at 19:37 | comment | added | Kevin B | Would be nice to be able express disagreement at the same cost as expressing agreement. | |
| Oct 27, 2014 at 19:31 | comment | added | Kevin B | I used to have enough rep to downvote, then... i downvoted it away. | |
| Sep 30, 2014 at 2:47 | history | closed |
Martijn Pieters nicael ale random discussion Users with the discussion badge or a synonym can single-handedly close discussion questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed. |
Duplicate of Why do we have a down vote rep threshold for meta? | |
| Sep 30, 2014 at 2:42 | history | edited | canon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 56 characters in body
|
| Sep 29, 2014 at 21:41 | history | edited | canon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Sep 29, 2014 at 21:36 | history | edited | canon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Sep 29, 2014 at 21:29 | history | edited | canon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 410 characters in body
|
| Sep 29, 2014 at 21:28 | comment | added | MTL | ( Note: now you have enough rep to downvote. Congrats! ) | |
| Sep 29, 2014 at 21:27 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 30, 2014 at 2:50 | |||||
| Sep 29, 2014 at 21:21 | answer | added | nicael | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 29, 2014 at 21:18 | comment | added | random | meta.stackexchange.com/questions/44188/… | |
| Sep 29, 2014 at 21:13 | comment | added | Martijn Pieters | @canon: where did you that idea from? I am saying this site is a normal site. I didn't say anything about child metas. | |
| Sep 29, 2014 at 21:11 | comment | added | Servy | @canon He didn't say that. | |
| Sep 29, 2014 at 21:10 | answer | added | MTL | timeline score: 5 | |
| Sep 29, 2014 at 21:09 | comment | added | Martijn Pieters | I'm still not sure what you are asking about here though. Meta.SE is a regular site, so you get reputation just like on any other regular SE site. | |
| Sep 29, 2014 at 21:08 | comment | added | MTL | If you want rep, then put out good ideas that you think other people might appreciate, and then wait for upvotes! | |
| Sep 29, 2014 at 21:06 | comment | added | Martijn Pieters | @canon: we do expect people to have a little more experience with this community before you can start downvoting though. | |
| Sep 29, 2014 at 21:06 | comment | added | Servy | If you find that you're not participating in the content on this meta then why do you need rep on this meta? | |
| Sep 29, 2014 at 21:06 | comment | added | random | What is "effective participation"? | |
| Sep 29, 2014 at 21:02 | comment | added | Martijn Pieters | The same way you do on any other site? You participate. You already have your +100 association bonus, so the only thing you cannot yet do is downvote. | |
| Sep 29, 2014 at 21:01 | history | asked | canon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |