Timeline for Make comment flags less stupid
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 11, 2015 at 11:28 | comment | added | Mari-Lou A Слава Україні | @EsotericScreenName, I never suggested adding more choices. Presently there are four descriptors, excluding "other". I don't think that's complicating anyone's life unduly. I have used all four options when I have considered flagging someone's comment. They have succeeded in helping me to focus on why and when comments should be deleted. But as I already suggested, two of the options could easily be merged into one. | |
| Apr 11, 2015 at 11:22 | comment | added | Esoteric Screen Name | I disagree that adding more choices makes flagging simpler. More choices means more nuances to consider, particularly if they revolve around technical considerations like noise, which you rightly state can be difficult to grasp for someone unfamiliar with the concept or term. Seems to me like fewer, more broadly scoped choices would make it easier for someone who's less familiar with English or SE jargon. | |
| Apr 11, 2015 at 11:16 | history | answered | Mari-Lou A Слава Україні | CC BY-SA 3.0 |