Skip to main content
removing feature-request tag per suggestion
Link
fluffy
  • 277
  • 1
  • 6
post-question-deletion additions
Source Link
fluffy
  • 277
  • 1
  • 6

Part of my daily routine is to go to stackexchange.com and see the hot questions. Today this hot question was up:

How can I fix my relationship with my 7 month old cat after I've constantly abused her the past month?

The question itself seemed like it might be a problem but my curiosity got the better of me, and I was not expecting to see quite so much graphic detail about the nature of the abuse -- to the extent that it ended up giving me a panic attack.

I feel like this question (especially in detail) is likely to cause a lot of emotional grief for a lot of people, and it would be beneficial if it could be flagged with a content warning and, ideally, if questions like those would not show up on the "hot questions" list.

The question itself is legitimate and I am glad the user asked the question -- and the answers they received are, also, quite beneficial. But it certainly isn't the sort of thing I was hoping to be confronted with, especially as a "hot question."

Thus, what I am proposing:

  1. Have the ability for the community to flag such comments with a content warning
  2. Prevent such posts from appearing on the "hot network questions" display and sidebars.

Edit: It appears that the question has since been deleted. I have mixed feelings about this (the answers which were given would have been very educational for the person asking). Regardless, I still feel like a content-warning mechanism would be helpful; sometimes there are questions that are important and valid but which are also troublesome for some people to see.

The use of CW-based partial-hiding is well-established in communities such as Mastodon, where people can put things behind a structured spoiler/CW tag that indicates what lies behind it.

Part of my daily routine is to go to stackexchange.com and see the hot questions. Today this hot question was up:

How can I fix my relationship with my 7 month old cat after I've constantly abused her the past month?

The question itself seemed like it might be a problem but my curiosity got the better of me, and I was not expecting to see quite so much graphic detail about the nature of the abuse -- to the extent that it ended up giving me a panic attack.

I feel like this question (especially in detail) is likely to cause a lot of emotional grief for a lot of people, and it would be beneficial if it could be flagged with a content warning and, ideally, if questions like those would not show up on the "hot questions" list.

The question itself is legitimate and I am glad the user asked the question -- and the answers they received are, also, quite beneficial. But it certainly isn't the sort of thing I was hoping to be confronted with, especially as a "hot question."

Thus, what I am proposing:

  1. Have the ability for the community to flag such comments with a content warning
  2. Prevent such posts from appearing on the "hot network questions" display and sidebars.

Part of my daily routine is to go to stackexchange.com and see the hot questions. Today this hot question was up:

How can I fix my relationship with my 7 month old cat after I've constantly abused her the past month?

The question itself seemed like it might be a problem but my curiosity got the better of me, and I was not expecting to see quite so much graphic detail about the nature of the abuse -- to the extent that it ended up giving me a panic attack.

I feel like this question (especially in detail) is likely to cause a lot of emotional grief for a lot of people, and it would be beneficial if it could be flagged with a content warning and, ideally, if questions like those would not show up on the "hot questions" list.

The question itself is legitimate and I am glad the user asked the question -- and the answers they received are, also, quite beneficial. But it certainly isn't the sort of thing I was hoping to be confronted with, especially as a "hot question."

Thus, what I am proposing:

  1. Have the ability for the community to flag such comments with a content warning
  2. Prevent such posts from appearing on the "hot network questions" display and sidebars.

Edit: It appears that the question has since been deleted. I have mixed feelings about this (the answers which were given would have been very educational for the person asking). Regardless, I still feel like a content-warning mechanism would be helpful; sometimes there are questions that are important and valid but which are also troublesome for some people to see.

The use of CW-based partial-hiding is well-established in communities such as Mastodon, where people can put things behind a structured spoiler/CW tag that indicates what lies behind it.

added 209 characters in body
Source Link
fluffy
  • 277
  • 1
  • 6

Part of my daily routine is to go to stackexchange.com and see the hot questions. Today this hot question was up:

How can I fix my relationship with my 7 month old cat after I've constantly abused her the past month?

The question itself seemed like it might be a problem but my curiosity got the better of me, and I was not expecting to see quite so much graphic detail about the nature of the abuse -- to the extent that it ended up giving me a panic attack.

I feel like this question (especially in detail) is likely to cause a lot of emotional grief for a lot of people, and it would be beneficial if it could be flagged with a content warning and, ideally, if questions like those would not show up on the "hot questions" list.

The question itself is legitimate and I am glad the user asked the question -- and the answers they received are, also, quite beneficial. But it certainly isn't the sort of thing I was hoping to be confronted with, especially as a "hot question."

Thus, what I am proposing:

  1. Have the ability for the community to flag such comments with a content warning
  2. Prevent such posts from appearing on the "hot network questions" display and sidebars.

Part of my daily routine is to go to stackexchange.com and see the hot questions. Today this hot question was up:

How can I fix my relationship with my 7 month old cat after I've constantly abused her the past month?

The question itself seemed like it might be a problem but my curiosity got the better of me, and I was not expecting to see quite so much graphic detail about the nature of the abuse -- to the extent that it ended up giving me a panic attack.

I feel like this question (especially in detail) is likely to cause a lot of emotional grief for a lot of people, and it would be beneficial if it could be flagged with a content warning and, ideally, if questions like those would not show up on the "hot questions" list.

The question itself is legitimate and I am glad the user asked the question -- and the answers they received are, also, quite beneficial. But it certainly isn't the sort of thing I was hoping to be confronted with, especially as a "hot question."

Part of my daily routine is to go to stackexchange.com and see the hot questions. Today this hot question was up:

How can I fix my relationship with my 7 month old cat after I've constantly abused her the past month?

The question itself seemed like it might be a problem but my curiosity got the better of me, and I was not expecting to see quite so much graphic detail about the nature of the abuse -- to the extent that it ended up giving me a panic attack.

I feel like this question (especially in detail) is likely to cause a lot of emotional grief for a lot of people, and it would be beneficial if it could be flagged with a content warning and, ideally, if questions like those would not show up on the "hot questions" list.

The question itself is legitimate and I am glad the user asked the question -- and the answers they received are, also, quite beneficial. But it certainly isn't the sort of thing I was hoping to be confronted with, especially as a "hot question."

Thus, what I am proposing:

  1. Have the ability for the community to flag such comments with a content warning
  2. Prevent such posts from appearing on the "hot network questions" display and sidebars.
Source Link
fluffy
  • 277
  • 1
  • 6
Loading