Skip to main content
corrected date
Source Link
Sir Cornflakes
  • 3.7k
  • 16
  • 30

I'm on the fence about this proposal

Since the reduction of the question upvote value in 20112010 was not an efficient measure to suppress low-quality questions, I don't expect an effect in favour of good questions by undoing this change. I expect no significant change in user behaviour here.

So the net effect is giving out a lot of reputation at once and by proxy giving out a lot of privileges at once. It will also make earning privileges easier, since even a controversial question voted +3/-3 already earns 24 reputation points. I don't know whether this is a good thing or not, maybe it will lead to other necessary adjustments like increasing the question downvote value or adjusting the privilege ladder steps.

I'm on the fence about this proposal

Since the reduction of the question upvote value in 2011 was not an efficient measure to suppress low-quality questions, I don't expect an effect in favour of good questions by undoing this change. I expect no significant change in user behaviour here.

So the net effect is giving out a lot of reputation at once and by proxy giving out a lot of privileges at once. It will also make earning privileges easier, since even a controversial question voted +3/-3 already earns 24 reputation points. I don't know whether this is a good thing or not, maybe it will lead to other necessary adjustments like increasing the question downvote value or adjusting the privilege ladder steps.

I'm on the fence about this proposal

Since the reduction of the question upvote value in 2010 was not an efficient measure to suppress low-quality questions, I don't expect an effect in favour of good questions by undoing this change. I expect no significant change in user behaviour here.

So the net effect is giving out a lot of reputation at once and by proxy giving out a lot of privileges at once. It will also make earning privileges easier, since even a controversial question voted +3/-3 already earns 24 reputation points. I don't know whether this is a good thing or not, maybe it will lead to other necessary adjustments like increasing the question downvote value or adjusting the privilege ladder steps.

fixed typos, light copy-editing
Source Link

I'm on the fence about this proposal

Since the reduction of the question upvote value in 2011 was not an efficient measure to suppress low quality-quality questions, I don't expect an effect in favour of good questions by undoing this change. I expect no significant change in user behaviour here.

So the net effect is giving out a lot of reputation at once and by proxy giving out a lot of priviledgesprivileges at once. IIt will also make earning priviledgesprivileges easier, since even a controversial question voted +3/-3 already gainsearns 24 points of reputation points. I don't know whether this is a good thing or not, maybe it will lead to other necessary adjustments like increasing the question downvote value or adjusting the priviledgeprivilege ladder steps.

I'm on the fence about this proposal

Since the reduction of the question upvote value in 2011 was not an efficient measure to suppress low quality questions, I don't expect an effect in favour of good questions by undoing this change. I expect no significant change in user behaviour here.

So the net effect is giving out a lot of reputation at once and by proxy giving out a lot of priviledges at once. I will also make earning priviledges easier, since even a controversial question voted +3/-3 already gains 24 points of reputation. I don't know whether this is a good thing or not, maybe it will lead to other necessary adjustments like increasing the question downvote value or adjusting the priviledge ladder steps.

I'm on the fence about this proposal

Since the reduction of the question upvote value in 2011 was not an efficient measure to suppress low-quality questions, I don't expect an effect in favour of good questions by undoing this change. I expect no significant change in user behaviour here.

So the net effect is giving out a lot of reputation at once and by proxy giving out a lot of privileges at once. It will also make earning privileges easier, since even a controversial question voted +3/-3 already earns 24 reputation points. I don't know whether this is a good thing or not, maybe it will lead to other necessary adjustments like increasing the question downvote value or adjusting the privilege ladder steps.

Source Link
Sir Cornflakes
  • 3.7k
  • 16
  • 30

I'm on the fence about this proposal

Since the reduction of the question upvote value in 2011 was not an efficient measure to suppress low quality questions, I don't expect an effect in favour of good questions by undoing this change. I expect no significant change in user behaviour here.

So the net effect is giving out a lot of reputation at once and by proxy giving out a lot of priviledges at once. I will also make earning priviledges easier, since even a controversial question voted +3/-3 already gains 24 points of reputation. I don't know whether this is a good thing or not, maybe it will lead to other necessary adjustments like increasing the question downvote value or adjusting the priviledge ladder steps.