Timeline for Duplicate post notice missing the duplicate
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2020 at 8:55 | history | edited | Yaakov EllisStaffMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 6, 2019 at 13:09 | comment | added | Mark Amery | @AdamLear, reckon you could guess at a timeline for y'all getting to this? The community is capable of adequately handling this themselves by hand if needed - all it takes is someone to craft a SEDE query to find affected questions, and then one willing mod on each affected site to reopen and reclose each of them, of which I doubt there are more than a few hundred across the entire network. We could even script it for them. Should we just go ahead and do that, or wait for the company to solve it on their end? | |
| Nov 16, 2019 at 23:46 | comment | added | Tom | You can still close the question as a dupe and the specific answers are here in the comment section. And @AdamLear can you also please update the state of the two linked answers when you investigate and maybe later fix this issue (i.e. add the status-review tag there as well)? Thank you. | |
| Nov 16, 2019 at 23:40 | comment | added | miken32 | Thanks @Tom I checked but didn't get onto the second page. Now if only there were some way to mark a question as a duplicate of an answer... | |
| Nov 16, 2019 at 23:35 | comment | added | Tom | Bug already reported here and here and here is the initial bug report which triggered the currently "fixed" version | |
| Nov 16, 2019 at 22:22 | history | edited | Adam LearStaffMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 16, 2019 at 22:22 | answer | added | Adam LearStaffMod | timeline score: 7 | |
| Nov 16, 2019 at 22:18 | comment | added | miken32 | @SonictheReinstateMonica-hog I don't recall ever seeing that before, I figured the user just put that in there. Regardless, the link to the duplicate quiestion should still live in a canonical place (i.e. the banner.) | |
| Nov 16, 2019 at 22:16 | comment | added | Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog | The question is an older duplicate, from the time the duplicate target was edited into the question body rather than being displayed as an automatic notice. See here for what I mean. | |
| Nov 16, 2019 at 22:16 | comment | added | Daniel Fischer | I guess it's because that's one of the old-style duplicates, where the dupe target was edited into the source. It shows in the old notices view. | |
| Nov 16, 2019 at 22:16 | comment | added | πάντα ῥεῖ | Hmm, I can spot a link to stackoverflow.com/questions/9666909/… in the top banner. | |
| Nov 16, 2019 at 22:11 | history | asked | miken32 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |