Timeline for Don't send a notification if you cast the final vote to reopen your own question
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2020 at 19:04 | history | edited | Brian NickelStaffMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 13, 2020 at 19:00 | answer | added | Brian NickelStaffMod | timeline score: 6 | |
| Nov 29, 2019 at 19:18 | history | edited | Meg RisdalStaffMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 29, 2019 at 13:37 | history | edited | Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 12 characters in body; edited title; added 13 characters in body
|
| Nov 29, 2019 at 13:33 | comment | added | Alex | It’s to prevent abuse. People are more likely to reopen their own posts illegitimately. If you know you’re going to have to suffer a notification you’ll think twice before doing it. | |
| Nov 29, 2019 at 12:04 | comment | added | Lightness Races in Orbit | Hooray! Blimey that's chummy. Also "anyone can answer it now" is probably not true... | |
| Nov 29, 2019 at 11:50 | comment | added | Luuklag | I wonder if the same thing happens when you post the 5th re-open vote on one of your own questions then. | |
| Nov 29, 2019 at 11:41 | comment | added | Glorfindel Mod | @Luuklag I was pretty aware that my dupehammer would be in effect. Moreover, if you cast the final reopen vote, the page is reloaded so you immediately see the effect. I think I got the notification a short while later, after I navigated away. | |
| Nov 29, 2019 at 10:51 | comment | added | Luuklag | This definitely is an edge case. Since when you would do a regular vote to re-open you don't know if it will be successful, besides when you cast the 5th and binding reopen vote. Which would be a second edge case. | |
| Nov 29, 2019 at 10:37 | comment | added | F1Krazy | I hate it when websites do this. Even worse when it's an email. "Hey F1Krazy, F1Krazy just did X!" Yes, I know I did that. | |
| Nov 29, 2019 at 10:33 | history | asked | GlorfindelMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |