Timeline for Improving Review Queues - Design overview I: Onboarding and updating workflows

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

5 events

when toggle format	what		by	license	comment
Jun 10, 2020 at 9:11	comment	added	Jeremy Caney		Though, in my case, I’m also just far more comfortable reviewing answers at this point. After a few review suspensions in Triage back in March, I remain really nervous about reviewing questions—even though I’ve since reviewed thousands of answers between Low Quality Posts, First Posts, and Late Answers. The criteria for questions continues to feel a bit capricious to me, with too much room for suspensions over what feels like reasonable disagreement over judgment calls. By contrast, the criteria for answers feels far more deterministic and well-defined.
Jun 10, 2020 at 8:58	comment	added	Jeremy Caney		I wholeheartedly agree. This is precisely why I always filter by either Answers or Questions when reviewing First Posts. I otherwise find it really difficult to context shift between them. The conditional rubric just becomes too complicated for my brain to juggle.
Apr 24, 2020 at 19:14	comment	added	Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog		@Z4-tier It's the fact that you're reviewing both questions and answers at the same time. Reviewing one requires a different mindset and workflow from the other, and having to switch between them repeatedly is a pain. Also, you can get confused and review the wrong way if you don't check whether you're looking at a question or an answer. As I said, I'd like questions from First Posts to be moved to Triage, while First Posts and Late Answers are kept solely for answers, so that they're reviewed separately.
Apr 24, 2020 at 19:08	comment	added	Z4-tier		What would be detrimental about merging First Posts and Late Answers with Triage? They are all "front line" intake activities, and Triage is certainly the most concise name.
Apr 23, 2020 at 22:24	history	answered	Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog	CC BY-SA 4.0