Skip to main content
edited tags
Link
Tinkeringbell Mod
  • 41.3k
  • 13
  • 70
  • 185
edited tags
Link
Tinkeringbell Mod
  • 41.3k
  • 13
  • 70
  • 185
edited body; edited tags
Source Link
animuson StaffMod
  • 190.4k
  • 38
  • 584
  • 854

I happened to notice a chat user who has the following information in their profile: "This user is suspended on the parent site and cannot chat for 64 days."

At the same time the user is not suspended on the site which is linked in their profile.

So the information in the profile is actually inconsistent. (On one hand, it claims that the user is suspended on the parent site. On the other hand, there is a link to the profile on a site where the user is suspended.)

Is this a butbug? Or it works as expected and I missed something?


I did not know how to put this into a bug report without linking to a specific user. At the same time, I did not want to bring attention to one specific user. I decided to post in this way with more details in a flag - to let the moderators or the Stack Exchange team to decide how much can be revealed.

I happened to notice a chat user who has the following information in their profile: "This user is suspended on the parent site and cannot chat for 64 days."

At the same time the user is not suspended on the site which is linked in their profile.

So the information in the profile is actually inconsistent. (On one hand, it claims that the user is suspended on the parent site. On the other hand, there is a link to the profile on a site where the user is suspended.)

Is this a but? Or it works as expected and I missed something?


I did not know how to put this into a bug report without linking to a specific user. At the same time, I did not want to bring attention to one specific user. I decided to post in this way with more details in a flag - to let the moderators or the Stack Exchange team to decide how much can be revealed.

I happened to notice a chat user who has the following information in their profile: "This user is suspended on the parent site and cannot chat for 64 days."

At the same time the user is not suspended on the site which is linked in their profile.

So the information in the profile is actually inconsistent. (On one hand, it claims that the user is suspended on the parent site. On the other hand, there is a link to the profile on a site where the user is suspended.)

Is this a bug? Or it works as expected and I missed something?


I did not know how to put this into a bug report without linking to a specific user. At the same time, I did not want to bring attention to one specific user. I decided to post in this way with more details in a flag - to let the moderators or the Stack Exchange team to decide how much can be revealed.

Source Link
Martin
  • 15.6k
  • 3
  • 30
  • 107
Loading