In various parts of the network I've been active at - there's occasional complaints of bug-fix requests, such as the Autocard Feature being bugfixed and the one here where lowered meta thresholds are broken
These requests have certain things in common - they're pretty low priority, and either further down or unlikely to be on the road map, but the impact that fixing these on their respective communities would be high.
Folks have also been... distinctly unhappy over them, and while they don't affect the broader network, they can be seen as quality of life issues for the respective sites. They are... nice things, even if they may not be essential in the wider scheme of things.
In both these cases the causes seem understood or well documented - they're just not high enough priority to get far enough up the roadmap to actually fix.
While I am aware of a few potential pathways to get these fixed, and that the public platform team's resources are limited, it seems that fixing these older issues where time/resources permit somewhat quicker would be welcome by the communities in question
What would be the process to get these requests revisited? Who's involved, and what would be the best ways to work with folks to get these issues triaged and sorted out?
